Study of key risks in the process of formation and implementation of the state science and technology policy in modern Russia

D. Znamensky, Nikolay A. Omelchenko, Artem V. Kirka, E. Kryukova
{"title":"Study of key risks in the process of formation and implementation of the state science and technology policy in modern Russia","authors":"D. Znamensky, Nikolay A. Omelchenko, Artem V. Kirka, E. Kryukova","doi":"10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern state policy is developed and implemented in conditions of high uncertainty: the number of dangers and threats increases not only by type (financial, political, environmental, technological, space, ideological, etc.), but also by the scale of the possible consequences of the occurrence of probable events. The relevance of the study outlined in this article is due to the high degree of uncertainty in the results of scientific and technological development, as well as the practical absence of a unified risk management methodology in the process of forming and implementing state policy in Russia. At the same time, risk management in the field of public administration has long been a practice in Western countries. Currently, it has become the basis for the modernization of public administration in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States of America, which makes it relevant to study the experience of these countries and its adaptation to national realities. Summarizing the practice of risk analysis in the development and implementation of government programs and policies in Russia, it can be noted that at present, risk analysis is only part of the practice of government bodies. The developers of state programs are limited to listing risks and distributing them in three (high, medium, low risk), and even two groups (high risk, low risk). Such an approach makes it difficult to develop effective measures for managing risks and leveling them, and limits control over the implementation of the program. As a result, program adjustments are usually suggested as risk management measures, but solutions to problems or the use of alternative risk management strategies are not considered. At the same time, by now, risk management is increasingly being incorporated into the activities of state and local authorities, becoming a regular function of government. Certain authorities actively use risk management in their practice (for example, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the Government of Moscow), however, the scientific and methodological basis for risk assessment in the Russian authorities is only beginning to take shape. The latter circumstance even more actualizes research in the field of public policy risk management, especially in the field of science and technology. In the course of this study, the authors attempt to substantiate the method of expert assessments of key risks arising in the process of the formation and implementation of the state science and technology policy in modern Russia. The experts were asked to assess the degree of influence of eight hypothetical risks on the processes of formation and implementation of the Russian Federation policy in the field of science and technology or to add their own risk formulation, as well as assess their significance on a 5-point scale, predict the dynamics of the risks presented and specify these risks as applied to priority directions of development of science and technology of the Russian Federation. Expert evaluations and their generalized proposals can be used in the risk management practice of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, as well as the Russian Academy of Sciences. Keywords–state policy, science and technology policy, risks, risk prevention, risk management","PeriodicalId":129193,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern state policy is developed and implemented in conditions of high uncertainty: the number of dangers and threats increases not only by type (financial, political, environmental, technological, space, ideological, etc.), but also by the scale of the possible consequences of the occurrence of probable events. The relevance of the study outlined in this article is due to the high degree of uncertainty in the results of scientific and technological development, as well as the practical absence of a unified risk management methodology in the process of forming and implementing state policy in Russia. At the same time, risk management in the field of public administration has long been a practice in Western countries. Currently, it has become the basis for the modernization of public administration in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States of America, which makes it relevant to study the experience of these countries and its adaptation to national realities. Summarizing the practice of risk analysis in the development and implementation of government programs and policies in Russia, it can be noted that at present, risk analysis is only part of the practice of government bodies. The developers of state programs are limited to listing risks and distributing them in three (high, medium, low risk), and even two groups (high risk, low risk). Such an approach makes it difficult to develop effective measures for managing risks and leveling them, and limits control over the implementation of the program. As a result, program adjustments are usually suggested as risk management measures, but solutions to problems or the use of alternative risk management strategies are not considered. At the same time, by now, risk management is increasingly being incorporated into the activities of state and local authorities, becoming a regular function of government. Certain authorities actively use risk management in their practice (for example, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the Government of Moscow), however, the scientific and methodological basis for risk assessment in the Russian authorities is only beginning to take shape. The latter circumstance even more actualizes research in the field of public policy risk management, especially in the field of science and technology. In the course of this study, the authors attempt to substantiate the method of expert assessments of key risks arising in the process of the formation and implementation of the state science and technology policy in modern Russia. The experts were asked to assess the degree of influence of eight hypothetical risks on the processes of formation and implementation of the Russian Federation policy in the field of science and technology or to add their own risk formulation, as well as assess their significance on a 5-point scale, predict the dynamics of the risks presented and specify these risks as applied to priority directions of development of science and technology of the Russian Federation. Expert evaluations and their generalized proposals can be used in the risk management practice of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, as well as the Russian Academy of Sciences. Keywords–state policy, science and technology policy, risks, risk prevention, risk management
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代俄罗斯国家科技政策形成与实施过程中的关键风险研究
现代国家政策是在高度不确定的条件下制定和实施的:危险和威胁的数量不仅随着类型(金融、政治、环境、技术、空间、意识形态等)的增加而增加,而且随着可能事件发生的可能后果的规模而增加。本文中概述的研究的相关性是由于科技发展结果的高度不确定性,以及在俄罗斯国家政策形成和实施过程中缺乏统一的风险管理方法。与此同时,风险管理在公共行政领域早已成为西方国家的实践。目前,它已成为联合王国、加拿大和美利坚合众国公共行政现代化的基础,因此研究这些国家的经验及其对本国现实的适应具有现实意义。总结俄罗斯政府计划和政策的制定和实施中风险分析的实践,可以注意到,目前,风险分析只是政府机构实践的一部分。国家项目的开发者仅限于列出风险并将其分为三组(高、中、低风险),甚至两组(高风险、低风险)。这种方法使得很难制定有效的措施来管理风险和平衡风险,并且限制了对项目实施的控制。因此,通常建议将程序调整作为风险管理措施,但不考虑问题的解决方案或替代风险管理策略的使用。与此同时,到目前为止,风险管理正越来越多地纳入国家和地方当局的活动,成为政府的一项常规职能。某些当局在其实践中积极使用风险管理(例如,紧急情况部、莫斯科政府),但是,俄罗斯当局进行风险评估的科学和方法基础才刚刚开始形成。后一种情况更是现实了公共政策风险管理领域尤其是科技领域的研究。在本研究的过程中,作者试图对现代俄罗斯国家科技政策形成和实施过程中产生的关键风险进行专家评估的方法进行实证。专家们被要求评估八种假设风险对俄罗斯联邦科学和技术领域政策形成和执行过程的影响程度,或加入他们自己的风险表述,并以五分制评估其重要性,预测所存在风险的动态,并具体说明这些风险适用于俄罗斯联邦科学和技术发展的优先方向。专家评价及其一般性建议可用于俄罗斯联邦科学和高等教育部以及俄罗斯科学院的风险管理实践。关键词:国家政策,科技政策,风险,风险防范,风险管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnocultural self-determination of students in the educational environment of the University Innovations as factor of sustainable development of economic systems The role of the Moscow exchange society in the development of commercial education Private law in the Russian law system: conceptual understanding and development prospects Use of public-private partnership tools for regional development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1