Wave Optics Simulations of a Dual Beacon Hartmann Turbulence Sensor

J. McCrae, Christopher A. Rice, Steven T. Fiorino, S. Bose-Pillai, A. Archibald
{"title":"Wave Optics Simulations of a Dual Beacon Hartmann Turbulence Sensor","authors":"J. McCrae, Christopher A. Rice, Steven T. Fiorino, S. Bose-Pillai, A. Archibald","doi":"10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wave optics were used to simulate a dual beacon Hartmann Turbulence Sensor (HTS). The system simulated was used experimentally to measure turbulence profiles. These simulations were intended to help explain differences between the experimental results and theoretical predictions. The theoretically predicted results presume weak turbulence, a Kolmogorov power spectrum for the turbulence, and a geometric optics derived weighting of the turbulence along the path. The simulations carried out used a modified von Kármán spectrum, with finite inner and outer scales, so the effects of these scales could be readily studied. A number of interesting results were obtained. The simulations resulted in lower tilt variances in the HTS subapertures than expected, but this had little end effect on the turbulence profiles produced. The effect of the inner and outer scales on this point will be discussed. The profiling technique proved to be powerful enough to sometimes resolve individual phase screens used in simulation. While this result is very interesting, it points to the challenges in simulating a system like this, rather than any difference between theory and experiment. Finally, while the geometric optics presumption is seen as ignoring diffraction, no conclusion on the differences between theory and experiment (or simulation) based upon this point was made. The simulations concentrated on simulating an actual HTS system with a 32 × 32 subaperture array on a 16″ telescope at a 1 km range.","PeriodicalId":114560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Wave optics were used to simulate a dual beacon Hartmann Turbulence Sensor (HTS). The system simulated was used experimentally to measure turbulence profiles. These simulations were intended to help explain differences between the experimental results and theoretical predictions. The theoretically predicted results presume weak turbulence, a Kolmogorov power spectrum for the turbulence, and a geometric optics derived weighting of the turbulence along the path. The simulations carried out used a modified von Kármán spectrum, with finite inner and outer scales, so the effects of these scales could be readily studied. A number of interesting results were obtained. The simulations resulted in lower tilt variances in the HTS subapertures than expected, but this had little end effect on the turbulence profiles produced. The effect of the inner and outer scales on this point will be discussed. The profiling technique proved to be powerful enough to sometimes resolve individual phase screens used in simulation. While this result is very interesting, it points to the challenges in simulating a system like this, rather than any difference between theory and experiment. Finally, while the geometric optics presumption is seen as ignoring diffraction, no conclusion on the differences between theory and experiment (or simulation) based upon this point was made. The simulations concentrated on simulating an actual HTS system with a 32 × 32 subaperture array on a 16″ telescope at a 1 km range.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双信标哈特曼湍流传感器的波光学模拟
采用波动光学模拟了双信标哈特曼湍流传感器(HTS)。所模拟的系统已用于湍流剖面的实验测量。这些模拟是为了帮助解释实验结果和理论预测之间的差异。理论上预测的结果假设弱湍流,湍流的柯尔莫哥洛夫功率谱,以及沿路径湍流的几何光学派生加权。模拟使用了改进的von Kármán谱,具有有限的内外尺度,因此可以很容易地研究这些尺度的影响。得到了一些有趣的结果。模拟结果表明,高温超导子孔径的倾斜偏差比预期的要小,但这对产生的湍流剖面几乎没有影响。我们将讨论内外尺度对这一点的影响。分析技术被证明是强大的,有时足以解决在模拟中使用的单个相位屏幕。虽然这个结果非常有趣,但它指出了模拟这样一个系统的挑战,而不是理论和实验之间的任何区别。最后,虽然几何光学的假设被视为忽略了衍射,但基于这一点,没有得出理论与实验(或模拟)之间的差异的结论。模拟的重点是在16″望远镜上模拟一个实际的HTS系统,该系统具有32 × 32子孔径阵列,距离为1 km。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Integrated Innovative 3D Radiation Protection Fabric for Advanced Spacesuits and Systems Model-based Tools designed for the FACE™ Technical Standard, Editions 3.0 & 2.1 Can Adaptive Response and Evolution Make Survival of Extremophile Bacteria Possible on Mars? Initial Orbit Determination Using Simplex Fusion Headline-based visualization to prioritize events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1