Prevalence of Perceived Anxiety in General People, Students and Healthcare Professionals during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Scientific Review

M. Nayan, Tirtha Nandi, R. Ghosh
{"title":"Prevalence of Perceived Anxiety in General People, Students and Healthcare Professionals during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Scientific Review","authors":"M. Nayan, Tirtha Nandi, R. Ghosh","doi":"10.9734/ajrid/2023/v12i4249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global severity of COVID-19 remains high which results anxiety and other mental health problems, also it altered people's everyday lives, affected human connections and economic operations. The goal of this comprehensive review was to identify the effects of the linkage COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of different groups and communities. This study compiled evidences of a link between anxiety rates and the COVID-19 pandemic. The evaluation period started in June’ 2022 and ended on August’2022, during this time, total four databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, Tailor & Francis Online, and Springer were used to search scientific literatures. A total 616 studies were identified from all four databases and 63 scientific literatures were selected based of predetermined criteria for review which were published in between 2020 to 2022. Three groups of population such as general population, students and healthcare professionals were taken for review the findings from the selected literatures. Gender, physical disorders, psychiatric disorders, COVID infection, infection rates in colleagues or family members, experience of frontline work & non-frontline work, close contact with infected patients, high exposure risk, quarantine experience, etc. were highly considered as factors associated with increased prevalence of anxiety among all three groups. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the general population, healthcare professionals, and students experienced an increase in the prevalence of mental diseases, whereas infected individuals had a decrease. Females were highly prevalent to anxiety than male. Our comprehensive review concluded significant co-relation between anxiety and COVID-19 but long-term study is needed to better understand which may define the population's mental condition in future.","PeriodicalId":166387,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrid/2023/v12i4249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global severity of COVID-19 remains high which results anxiety and other mental health problems, also it altered people's everyday lives, affected human connections and economic operations. The goal of this comprehensive review was to identify the effects of the linkage COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of different groups and communities. This study compiled evidences of a link between anxiety rates and the COVID-19 pandemic. The evaluation period started in June’ 2022 and ended on August’2022, during this time, total four databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, Tailor & Francis Online, and Springer were used to search scientific literatures. A total 616 studies were identified from all four databases and 63 scientific literatures were selected based of predetermined criteria for review which were published in between 2020 to 2022. Three groups of population such as general population, students and healthcare professionals were taken for review the findings from the selected literatures. Gender, physical disorders, psychiatric disorders, COVID infection, infection rates in colleagues or family members, experience of frontline work & non-frontline work, close contact with infected patients, high exposure risk, quarantine experience, etc. were highly considered as factors associated with increased prevalence of anxiety among all three groups. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the general population, healthcare professionals, and students experienced an increase in the prevalence of mental diseases, whereas infected individuals had a decrease. Females were highly prevalent to anxiety than male. Our comprehensive review concluded significant co-relation between anxiety and COVID-19 but long-term study is needed to better understand which may define the population's mental condition in future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行期间,普通人群、学生和医疗保健专业人员的感知焦虑患病率:一项全面的科学综述
COVID-19的全球严重程度仍然很高,导致焦虑和其他精神健康问题,也改变了人们的日常生活,影响了人际关系和经济运作。这项综合综述的目的是确定COVID-19大流行对不同群体和社区心理健康的影响。这项研究收集了焦虑率与COVID-19大流行之间存在联系的证据。评估期从2022年6月开始至2022年8月结束,在此期间,共使用PubMed、Science Direct、Tailor & Francis Online和Springer四个数据库检索科学文献。从所有四个数据库中共确定了616项研究,并根据预先确定的标准选择了63篇科学文献,这些文献发表于2020年至2022年之间。三组人群,如一般人群,学生和卫生保健专业人员被用于审查所选文献的研究结果。性别、身体障碍、精神障碍、COVID感染、同事或家庭成员感染率、一线和非一线工作经历、与感染患者密切接触、高暴露风险、隔离经历等被高度认为是三组患者焦虑患病率增加的相关因素。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,普通人群、卫生保健专业人员和学生的精神疾病患病率上升,而感染者的发病率下降。女性比男性更容易焦虑。我们的综合评价得出焦虑与COVID-19之间存在显着的相关关系,但需要长期研究来更好地了解哪些因素可能决定未来人群的精神状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report on Peritoneal Tuberculosis in an Immunocompromised Patient Self Medication Against COVID19 Infection: Assessment of Practices among Residents in a Semi Urban Nigerian Community Knowledge of Associated Risk Factors of Chronic Kidney Disease among Secondary School Teachers in Anambra State Nigeria Nursing Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of the Evidence Assessment of Cefuroxime and Cefuroxime Clavulanic Acid Prescription Practices for Infection Management in Routine Indian Healthcare Settings: Expert Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1