Assessment of Cefuroxime and Cefuroxime Clavulanic Acid Prescription Practices for Infection Management in Routine Indian Healthcare Settings: Expert Insights

Manjula S, Krishna Kumar M
{"title":"Assessment of Cefuroxime and Cefuroxime Clavulanic Acid Prescription Practices for Infection Management in Routine Indian Healthcare Settings: Expert Insights","authors":"Manjula S, Krishna Kumar M","doi":"10.9734/ajrid/2024/v15i6351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cefuroxime axetil has shown effectiveness as part of intravenous/oral sequential therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment, although some countries currently lack dosage recommendations for this regimen. In addition, the perspectives of clinicians were not studied.  So, this study evaluated the prescription practice of cefuroxime, and cefuroxime+ clavulanic acid in the management of infections in routine Indian settings.\nMethods: The cross-sectional survey, titled ‘Cefuroxime & Cefuroxime+Clavulanic acid in Management of Infections: Expert Perspective (CARE) Study’, utilized a 20-item, multiple-response questionnaire to gather expert opinion from specialists regarding the clinical use of cefuroxime and cefuroxime + clavulanic acid in managing infections. The survey encompassed questions about current prescription practices, clinical observations, preferences, and experiences related to the use of these antibiotics in routine settings.\nResults: Among the 164 clinicians surveyed, 78% of the respondents indicated that cefuroxime was highly effective in managing lower respiratory tract infections. Additionally, 91% of the experts stated that the combination of cefuroxime and clavulanic acid was very effective in managing infections. The majority of clinicians recommended cefuroxime + clavulanic acid as the initial therapy for complicated urinary tract infections (88%), as well as first-line therapy for uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (45%) and community-acquired pneumonia (58%). According to 40% of the clinicians, cefuroxime + clavulanic acid was recommended as the initial therapy for 21-30% of patients suspected of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Most respondents (88%) preferred cefuroxime + clavulanic acid as the antibiotic for managing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.\nConclusion: The survey has emphasized the critical role of cefuroxime and cefuroxime + clavulanic acid as antibiotics in managing diverse infections. Clinicians' recognition of their efficacy and preference for combination therapy has underscored the importance of antibiotic stewardship in optimizing patient care.","PeriodicalId":166387,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases","volume":"42 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrid/2024/v15i6351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cefuroxime axetil has shown effectiveness as part of intravenous/oral sequential therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment, although some countries currently lack dosage recommendations for this regimen. In addition, the perspectives of clinicians were not studied.  So, this study evaluated the prescription practice of cefuroxime, and cefuroxime+ clavulanic acid in the management of infections in routine Indian settings. Methods: The cross-sectional survey, titled ‘Cefuroxime & Cefuroxime+Clavulanic acid in Management of Infections: Expert Perspective (CARE) Study’, utilized a 20-item, multiple-response questionnaire to gather expert opinion from specialists regarding the clinical use of cefuroxime and cefuroxime + clavulanic acid in managing infections. The survey encompassed questions about current prescription practices, clinical observations, preferences, and experiences related to the use of these antibiotics in routine settings. Results: Among the 164 clinicians surveyed, 78% of the respondents indicated that cefuroxime was highly effective in managing lower respiratory tract infections. Additionally, 91% of the experts stated that the combination of cefuroxime and clavulanic acid was very effective in managing infections. The majority of clinicians recommended cefuroxime + clavulanic acid as the initial therapy for complicated urinary tract infections (88%), as well as first-line therapy for uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (45%) and community-acquired pneumonia (58%). According to 40% of the clinicians, cefuroxime + clavulanic acid was recommended as the initial therapy for 21-30% of patients suspected of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Most respondents (88%) preferred cefuroxime + clavulanic acid as the antibiotic for managing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Conclusion: The survey has emphasized the critical role of cefuroxime and cefuroxime + clavulanic acid as antibiotics in managing diverse infections. Clinicians' recognition of their efficacy and preference for combination therapy has underscored the importance of antibiotic stewardship in optimizing patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估印度常规医疗机构中用于感染管理的头孢呋辛和头孢呋辛克拉维酸处方做法:专家观点
背景:作为治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的静脉/口服序贯疗法的一部分,头孢呋辛酯已显示出其疗效,但一些国家目前还没有这种疗法的剂量建议。此外,临床医生的观点也未得到研究。 因此,本研究评估了头孢呋辛和头孢呋辛+克拉维酸在印度常规感染治疗中的处方实践:这项名为 "头孢呋辛和头孢呋辛+克拉维酸在感染治疗中的应用 "的横断面调查:专家视角(CARE)研究 "的横断面调查采用了 20 个项目的多重应答问卷,以收集专家对临床使用头孢呋辛和头孢呋辛+克拉维酸治疗感染的意见。调查内容包括目前的处方做法、临床观察、偏好以及在常规情况下使用这些抗生素的相关经验等问题:结果:在接受调查的 164 名临床医生中,78% 的受访者表示头孢呋辛在治疗下呼吸道感染方面非常有效。此外,91% 的专家表示头孢呋辛和克拉维酸联用对控制感染非常有效。大多数临床医生建议将头孢呋辛+克拉维酸作为复杂性尿路感染的初始疗法(88%),以及无并发症皮肤和软组织感染(45%)和社区获得性肺炎(58%)的一线疗法。40% 的临床医生建议将头孢呋辛+克拉维酸作为 21-30% 的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染疑似患者的初始疗法。大多数受访者(88%)首选头孢呋辛+克拉维酸作为治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染的抗生素:调查强调了头孢呋辛和头孢呋辛+克拉维酸作为抗生素在治疗各种感染中的关键作用。临床医生对这两种抗生素疗效的认可以及对联合疗法的偏好凸显了抗生素管理在优化患者护理方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report on Peritoneal Tuberculosis in an Immunocompromised Patient Self Medication Against COVID19 Infection: Assessment of Practices among Residents in a Semi Urban Nigerian Community Knowledge of Associated Risk Factors of Chronic Kidney Disease among Secondary School Teachers in Anambra State Nigeria Nursing Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of the Evidence Assessment of Cefuroxime and Cefuroxime Clavulanic Acid Prescription Practices for Infection Management in Routine Indian Healthcare Settings: Expert Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1