Practical Volume-Hiding Encrypted Multi-Maps with Optimal Overhead and Beyond

Jianfeng Wang, Shifeng Sun, Tianci Li, Saiyu Qi, Xiaofeng Chen
{"title":"Practical Volume-Hiding Encrypted Multi-Maps with Optimal Overhead and Beyond","authors":"Jianfeng Wang, Shifeng Sun, Tianci Li, Saiyu Qi, Xiaofeng Chen","doi":"10.1145/3548606.3559345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Encrypted multi-map (EMM), as a special case of structured encryption, has attracted extensive attention recently. However, most of EMM constructions reveal the real volumes of queried keys, which can be leveraged to launch leakage-abuse attacks, as demonstrated by Kellaris et al. in CCS 2016 and Kornaropoulos et al. in S&P 2021. In this paper, we propose a practical non-lossy volume-hiding EMM scheme, XorMM, that can achieve optimal query communication complexity with minimal storage cost. Specifically, compared to the state-of-the-art dprfMM (Patel et al. CCS 2019), the client in our scheme receives only ℓ matching results while not suffering from data loss, where ℓ is the maximum volume of all keys. In addition, the storage cost of XorMM is approximately 1.23n, where n is the total number of key/value pairs. In contrast, the query communication and storage complexity of dprfMM is 2ℓ and 2(1+α)n respectively, where 0<α<1 is a small constant. Furthermore, we initiate the study of volume-hiding EMM against malicious servers. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first verifiable volume-hiding EMM scheme, XorMM, from merely symmetric cryptographic tools. The scheme still outperforms dprfMM while supporting verifiability, the query complexity and storage overhead of which are approximately ℓ +1 and 2.46n, respectively. Finally, we implement our proposed schemes and compare them with the most efficient scheme dprfMM (Patel et al. CCS 2019). The experimental results demonstrate that both of our schemes are superior to the state-of-the-art in both search and storage cost. In particular, XorMM (resp. VXorMM) brings a saving of 76% (resp. 52%) in server storage cost and achieves a speedup of 1.8x (resp. 1.6x) in search latency.","PeriodicalId":435197,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3548606.3559345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Encrypted multi-map (EMM), as a special case of structured encryption, has attracted extensive attention recently. However, most of EMM constructions reveal the real volumes of queried keys, which can be leveraged to launch leakage-abuse attacks, as demonstrated by Kellaris et al. in CCS 2016 and Kornaropoulos et al. in S&P 2021. In this paper, we propose a practical non-lossy volume-hiding EMM scheme, XorMM, that can achieve optimal query communication complexity with minimal storage cost. Specifically, compared to the state-of-the-art dprfMM (Patel et al. CCS 2019), the client in our scheme receives only ℓ matching results while not suffering from data loss, where ℓ is the maximum volume of all keys. In addition, the storage cost of XorMM is approximately 1.23n, where n is the total number of key/value pairs. In contrast, the query communication and storage complexity of dprfMM is 2ℓ and 2(1+α)n respectively, where 0<α<1 is a small constant. Furthermore, we initiate the study of volume-hiding EMM against malicious servers. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first verifiable volume-hiding EMM scheme, XorMM, from merely symmetric cryptographic tools. The scheme still outperforms dprfMM while supporting verifiability, the query complexity and storage overhead of which are approximately ℓ +1 and 2.46n, respectively. Finally, we implement our proposed schemes and compare them with the most efficient scheme dprfMM (Patel et al. CCS 2019). The experimental results demonstrate that both of our schemes are superior to the state-of-the-art in both search and storage cost. In particular, XorMM (resp. VXorMM) brings a saving of 76% (resp. 52%) in server storage cost and achieves a speedup of 1.8x (resp. 1.6x) in search latency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实用卷隐藏加密多映射与最佳开销和超越
加密多映射(EMM)作为结构化加密的一种特例,近年来受到了广泛的关注。然而,大多数EMM结构揭示了查询密钥的真实数量,可以利用这些数据发起泄漏滥用攻击,如Kellaris等人在CCS 2016和Kornaropoulos等人在标准普尔2021中所展示的那样。在本文中,我们提出了一种实用的非有损卷隐藏EMM方案XorMM,它可以在最小的存储成本下实现最优的查询通信复杂度。具体来说,与最先进的dprfMM (Patel et al.)相比。CCS 2019),我们方案中的客户端只接收到r匹配结果,并且不会遭受数据丢失,其中r为所有密钥的最大体积。此外,XorMM的存储成本约为1.23n,其中n为键/值对的总数。相比之下,dprfMM的查询通信复杂度和存储复杂度分别为2 l和2(1+α)n,其中0<α<1是一个小常数。此外,我们还启动了针对恶意服务器的卷隐藏EMM的研究。据我们所知,我们提出了第一个可验证的卷隐藏EMM方案,XorMM,仅从对称加密工具。该方案在支持可验证性的同时仍优于dprfMM,其查询复杂度和存储开销分别约为1 +1和2.46n。最后,我们实现了我们提出的方案,并将它们与最有效的方案dprfMM (Patel et al.)进行了比较。CCS 2019)。实验结果表明,这两种方案在搜索和存储成本上都优于现有的方案。特别是XorMM (resp.)。VXorMM)带来76%的节省。(52%)的服务器存储成本,并实现1.8倍的加速(响应速度)。1.6倍)的搜索延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
P-Verifier: Understanding and Mitigating Security Risks in Cloud-based IoT Access Policies When Frodo Flips: End-to-End Key Recovery on FrodoKEM via Rowhammer Poster: MUSTARD - Adaptive Behavioral Analysis for Ransomware Detection Poster: Fingerprint-Face Friction Based Earable Authentication A Run a Day Won't Keep the Hacker Away: Inference Attacks on Endpoint Privacy Zones in Fitness Tracking Social Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1