Pay-As-You-Go Public Pension Systems: Two-sided Altruism and Endogenous Growth

Zaigui Yang
{"title":"Pay-As-You-Go Public Pension Systems: Two-sided Altruism and Endogenous Growth","authors":"Zaigui Yang","doi":"10.2202/2153-3792.1002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the framework of an overlapping generations model with two-sided altruism and endogenous growth, this paper calculates the rates of fertility, output growth, child-rearing cost, saving, consumption, net intertemporal transfer, bequest and gift, and compares the equilibrium solutions under different public pension systems. It proves that the fully-fertilitylinked public pension system (FFLPPS) is equivalent to the system without public pension (WPPS), and the partly-fertility-linked public pension system (PFLPPS) is equivalent to the conventional public pension system (CPPS). The CPPS is beneficial to developing countries in promoting economic growth and reducing population. It is necessary for developed countries to weigh gains and losses carefully if they hope to transform their CPPS (or PFLPPS) to the FFLPPS.","PeriodicalId":244368,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/2153-3792.1002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Within the framework of an overlapping generations model with two-sided altruism and endogenous growth, this paper calculates the rates of fertility, output growth, child-rearing cost, saving, consumption, net intertemporal transfer, bequest and gift, and compares the equilibrium solutions under different public pension systems. It proves that the fully-fertilitylinked public pension system (FFLPPS) is equivalent to the system without public pension (WPPS), and the partly-fertility-linked public pension system (PFLPPS) is equivalent to the conventional public pension system (CPPS). The CPPS is beneficial to developing countries in promoting economic growth and reducing population. It is necessary for developed countries to weigh gains and losses carefully if they hope to transform their CPPS (or PFLPPS) to the FFLPPS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现收现付公共养老金制度:双边利他主义与内生增长
本文在具有双边利他主义和内生增长的代际重叠模型框架下,计算了生育率、产出增长率、育儿成本、储蓄率、消费率、净跨期转移率、遗赠率和赠予率,并比较了不同公共养老金制度下的均衡解。证明了完全生育挂钩的公共养老金制度(FFLPPS)等同于没有生育挂钩的公共养老金制度(WPPS),部分生育挂钩的公共养老金制度(PFLPPS)等同于传统的公共养老金制度(CPPS)。CPPS有利于发展中国家促进经济增长和减少人口。发达国家如果希望将其养老保险计划(或PFLPPS)转变为FFLPPS,就有必要仔细权衡得失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimating Risk Relativity of Driving Records using Generalized Additive Models: A Statistical Approach for Auto Insurance Rate Regulation Assessing the Impact of Climate Risk Stresses on Life Insurance Portfolios The Risk of Natural Catastrophe in Early America: Perspectives from the Phoenix Assurance Company London and Nascent US Insurers Frontmatter Special Issue: History of Insurance in a Global Perspective: A Novel Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1