{"title":"Comparison of Reproducibility of Milled Acrylic Resin and Zirconia Models for 3-unit bridge Using Three-dimensional Analysis","authors":"Gang-Seok Park, Seong-Kyun Kim, S. Heo, J. Koak, Ji-Man Park, Jinsoo Ahn, D. Seo","doi":"10.32542/implantology.20180011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of milled acrylic resin and zirconia models using three-dimensional analysis. Material and Methods: Zirconia discs and acrylic resin blocks were milled to make models. Each model was scanned with a model scanner. The zirconia models were superimposed with other zirconia model, and the acrylic resin models were superimposed with other acrylic resin model threedimensionally. Root-mean-square (RMS) values were obtained. Distances between two superimposed models were measured. Statistical significances were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test and t-test. Results: The RMS values of the zirconia model and the acrylic resin model were not significantly different (p≥0.05). At the premolar site, distances between the zirconia models at the upper axial and at the lower axial wall were significantly smaller than for the acrylic resin models (p<0.05). At the molar site, distance between the zirconia models at the lower axial wall was significantly smaller than for the acrylic resin models (p<0.05). Conclusion: Although there is a difference in reproducibility between the milled acrylic resin model and the zirconia model in the localized region, no significant difference was found in the whole model.","PeriodicalId":370954,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
用三维分析方法比较研磨丙烯酸树脂和氧化锆三单元桥模型的再现性
版权所有©2018。韩国口腔颌面种植学会这是一篇基于知识共享署名非商业许可(http://creativecommons)的开放获取文章。(http://www.licenses/bync/4.0/),允许在任何媒介上不受限制地进行非商业使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原始作品。目的:本研究的目的是利用三维分析研究研磨丙烯酸树脂和氧化锆模型的可重复性。材料与方法:用氧化锆圆片和丙烯酸树脂块研磨制作模型。每个模型都用模型扫描仪扫描。将氧化锆模型与其他氧化锆模型进行三维叠加,将丙烯酸树脂模型与其他丙烯酸树脂模型进行三维叠加。获得均方根(RMS)值。测量了两个叠加模型之间的距离。统计学显著性采用Mann-Whitney U检验和t检验。结果:氧化锆模型与丙烯酸树脂模型的RMS值差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05)。在前磨牙位置,氧化锆模型在上轴和下轴壁上的距离明显小于丙烯酸树脂模型(p<0.05)。在磨牙部位,氧化锆模型在下轴壁处的距离明显小于丙烯酸树脂模型(p<0.05)。结论:虽然研磨丙烯酸树脂模型与氧化锆模型在局部区域的再现性存在差异,但在整个模型中无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。