A New Method of Boerhaave Syndrome Surgical Treatment and Its Experimental Justification

M. A. Rayhan, V. V. Bulynin, A. I. Zhdanov, Y. Parkhisenko, B. Leibovich
{"title":"A New Method of Boerhaave Syndrome Surgical Treatment and Its Experimental Justification","authors":"M. A. Rayhan, V. V. Bulynin, A. I. Zhdanov, Y. Parkhisenko, B. Leibovich","doi":"10.18499/2070-478X-2018-11-3-193-201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Spontaneous esophageal rupture (Boerhaave syndrome) is observed relatively rare ranging from 2.9% to 12% of all cases of damage of the esophagus. Today, there is not any categorical opinion about the effectiveness of different treatments among surgeons, there are not any single algorithms for the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment. Spontaneous esophageal rupture is a real threat for the life of patient: mortality up to 75% in the prehospital period and more than 90% in the postoperative period, and depends on the time interval between the rupture of the esophageal wall and the operation time, and also complications (suppurative esophagitis, suppurative mediastinitis, bilateral suppurative lobular pneumonia, sepsis). \nPurpose. To improve results of surgical treatment of patients with spontaneous esophageal rupture using the results obtained in the experiment. \nMaterials and methods. Since 2004 till 2017 twelve patients with spontaneous esophageal rupture were treated in our hospital. Ways of treatment of lower third of esophageal rupture: drainage of pleural cavity – 2 patients; closure of the defect, fundoplication with covered stitches by the bottom of the stomach – 2 patients; perforated hole was not sutured, and a cuff, covering the perforation, was formed from the bottom of the stomach (fundoplication by Chernousov) – 8 patients. These methods of surgical treatment were applied in the experiments on 120 rats. Each group consisted of 40 rats. \nResults and discussion. The pleural cavity drainage, lethality – 1 (50%) patient. The suturing of the defect of the esophageal walls, the fundoplication with the stitches, covered by the bottom of the stomach, failure of stitches – 2 patients, lethality – 1 (50%) patients. The perforated hole was not sutured, and the cuff was shaped from the bottom of the stomach, covering the perforation. Lethality – 2 (25%) patients, caused by bilateral pneumonia in contrast to progressive sepsis. Other patients operated on this method didn’t have any failure of stiches. \nIn the experiment: in the 1st group the failure of stitches was 87.5% and lethality – 100%; in the 2nd group the failure of stitches was 85% and lethality – 100%; in the 3rd group  there was not any failure of stitches, lethality – 17.5%. \nConclusions. The most effective method of treatment is the restoration of rupture esophagus without suturing, and forming a cuff from the bottom of the stomach, covering the perforation. Drainage of pleural cavity and nutrition through a nasogastric tube.","PeriodicalId":283981,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Experimental and Clinical Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Experimental and Clinical Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18499/2070-478X-2018-11-3-193-201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. Spontaneous esophageal rupture (Boerhaave syndrome) is observed relatively rare ranging from 2.9% to 12% of all cases of damage of the esophagus. Today, there is not any categorical opinion about the effectiveness of different treatments among surgeons, there are not any single algorithms for the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment. Spontaneous esophageal rupture is a real threat for the life of patient: mortality up to 75% in the prehospital period and more than 90% in the postoperative period, and depends on the time interval between the rupture of the esophageal wall and the operation time, and also complications (suppurative esophagitis, suppurative mediastinitis, bilateral suppurative lobular pneumonia, sepsis). Purpose. To improve results of surgical treatment of patients with spontaneous esophageal rupture using the results obtained in the experiment. Materials and methods. Since 2004 till 2017 twelve patients with spontaneous esophageal rupture were treated in our hospital. Ways of treatment of lower third of esophageal rupture: drainage of pleural cavity – 2 patients; closure of the defect, fundoplication with covered stitches by the bottom of the stomach – 2 patients; perforated hole was not sutured, and a cuff, covering the perforation, was formed from the bottom of the stomach (fundoplication by Chernousov) – 8 patients. These methods of surgical treatment were applied in the experiments on 120 rats. Each group consisted of 40 rats. Results and discussion. The pleural cavity drainage, lethality – 1 (50%) patient. The suturing of the defect of the esophageal walls, the fundoplication with the stitches, covered by the bottom of the stomach, failure of stitches – 2 patients, lethality – 1 (50%) patients. The perforated hole was not sutured, and the cuff was shaped from the bottom of the stomach, covering the perforation. Lethality – 2 (25%) patients, caused by bilateral pneumonia in contrast to progressive sepsis. Other patients operated on this method didn’t have any failure of stiches. In the experiment: in the 1st group the failure of stitches was 87.5% and lethality – 100%; in the 2nd group the failure of stitches was 85% and lethality – 100%; in the 3rd group  there was not any failure of stitches, lethality – 17.5%. Conclusions. The most effective method of treatment is the restoration of rupture esophagus without suturing, and forming a cuff from the bottom of the stomach, covering the perforation. Drainage of pleural cavity and nutrition through a nasogastric tube.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boerhaave综合征手术治疗新方法及其实验证明
的相关性。自发性食管破裂(Boerhaave综合征)相对罕见,约占所有食管损伤病例的2.9%至12%。今天,外科医生之间对不同治疗的有效性没有任何明确的看法,也没有任何单一的诊断和评估治疗的算法。自发性食管破裂是对患者生命的真正威胁:院前死亡率高达75%,术后死亡率超过90%,这取决于食管壁破裂与手术时间的间隔时间,也取决于并发症(化脓性食管炎、化脓性纵隔炎、双侧化脓性小叶性肺炎、败血症)。目的。目的:利用实验结果提高自发性食管破裂患者的手术治疗效果。材料和方法。自2004年至2017年,我院共收治自发性食管破裂患者12例。食管破裂下三分之一的治疗方法:胸腔引流术2例;封闭缺损,胃底盖针复底- 2例;穿孔孔不缝合,从胃底部形成一个袖带,覆盖穿孔(Chernousov的底襞)- 8例患者。这些手术治疗方法在120只大鼠身上进行了实验。每组40只大鼠。结果和讨论。胸膜腔引流,死亡1例(50%)。食管壁缺损处缝合,与缝线吻合,胃底覆盖,缝线失败2例,死亡1例(50%)。穿孔的洞没有缝合,袖带从胃底部形成,覆盖穿孔。致死率:2例(25%)患者,由双侧肺炎引起,与进行性败血症相反。其他采用此方法手术的患者均未出现缝合失败的情况。实验中:第一组缝线失败率为87.5%,致死率为100%;第二组缝线失败率为85%,致死率为100%;第3组无缝合失败,死亡率为17.5%。结论。最有效的治疗方法是在不缝合的情况下修复食管破裂,并从胃底形成一个袖带,覆盖穿孔处。经鼻胃管引流胸膜腔及营养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microbiological diagnostic criteria of infectious inflammatory complications after total knee replacement in the aspect of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) pathogenesis Factors of the Risk of Developing a Secondary Cataract and Recommendations for Conducting a Primary Posterior Capsulorhexis Justin Ivlianovich JANELIDZE – Chairman of the all-Union society of surgeons, Chief surgeon of the Soviet Navy, chief editor of the journal "Bulletin of surgery" (135th anniversary of birth) Features of the topographic anatomy of the rat trachea and the possibility of performing surgical interventions. Evaluation of the dynamics of the main indicators of treatment care and the long-term results of conservative treatment of ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1