Why Use Qualitative Methods to Study Culture in Economic Life?

V. Storr, Arielle John
{"title":"Why Use Qualitative Methods to Study Culture in Economic Life?","authors":"V. Storr, Arielle John","doi":"10.1108/S0193-230620180000020002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nHow should economists incorporate culture into their economic analysis? What empirical approaches to identifying, measuring, and analyzing the relationship between culture and economic action are most appropriate for economists? In particular, what can experimental economists learn from the methods of economic anthropologists, sociologists, and historians who study culture? We argue that while both quantitative and qualitative approaches can reveal interesting relationships between culture and economic actions/outcomes, especially in experimental research designs, qualitative methods help economists better understand people’s economic choices and the economic outcomes that emerge from those choices. This is because qualitative studies conceptualize culture as a pattern of meaning, take the relevant cultural data to be people’s thoughts and feelings, treat the market as a cultural phenomenon, and allow for novel explanations.","PeriodicalId":330367,"journal":{"name":"Research in Experimental Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-230620180000020002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract How should economists incorporate culture into their economic analysis? What empirical approaches to identifying, measuring, and analyzing the relationship between culture and economic action are most appropriate for economists? In particular, what can experimental economists learn from the methods of economic anthropologists, sociologists, and historians who study culture? We argue that while both quantitative and qualitative approaches can reveal interesting relationships between culture and economic actions/outcomes, especially in experimental research designs, qualitative methods help economists better understand people’s economic choices and the economic outcomes that emerge from those choices. This is because qualitative studies conceptualize culture as a pattern of meaning, take the relevant cultural data to be people’s thoughts and feelings, treat the market as a cultural phenomenon, and allow for novel explanations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么要用定性方法研究经济生活中的文化?
经济学家应该如何将文化纳入他们的经济分析?什么样的实证方法来识别、衡量和分析文化与经济行为之间的关系最适合经济学家?特别是,实验经济学家可以从研究文化的经济人类学家、社会学家和历史学家的方法中学到什么?我们认为,虽然定量和定性方法都可以揭示文化与经济行为/结果之间的有趣关系,特别是在实验研究设计中,但定性方法有助于经济学家更好地理解人们的经济选择以及这些选择产生的经济结果。这是因为定性研究将文化概念化为一种意义模式,将相关的文化数据视为人们的思想和感受,将市场视为一种文化现象,并允许新颖的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Offer Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Mechanisms The Robustness of Lemons in Experimental Markets Not as I Do: Hypocrisy Aversion and Optimal Punishment of Common Offenses Land-Assembly Experiments: A Survey Prelims
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1