Comparison of subsampling techniques for random subspace ensembles

Santhosh Pathical, G. Serpen
{"title":"Comparison of subsampling techniques for random subspace ensembles","authors":"Santhosh Pathical, G. Serpen","doi":"10.1109/ICMLC.2010.5581032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the comparison of three subsampling techniques for random subspace ensemble classifiers through an empirical study. A version of random subspace ensemble designed to address the challenges of high dimensional classification, entitled random subsample ensemble, within the voting combiner framework was evaluated for its performance for three different sampling methods which entailed random sampling without replacement, random sampling with replacement, and random partitioning. The random subsample ensemble was instantiated using three different base learners including C4.5, k-nearest neighbor, and naïve Bayes, and tested on five high-dimensional benchmark data sets in machine learning. Simulation results helped ascertain the optimal sampling technique for the ensemble, which turned out to be the sampling without replacement.","PeriodicalId":126080,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2010.5581032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper presents the comparison of three subsampling techniques for random subspace ensemble classifiers through an empirical study. A version of random subspace ensemble designed to address the challenges of high dimensional classification, entitled random subsample ensemble, within the voting combiner framework was evaluated for its performance for three different sampling methods which entailed random sampling without replacement, random sampling with replacement, and random partitioning. The random subsample ensemble was instantiated using three different base learners including C4.5, k-nearest neighbor, and naïve Bayes, and tested on five high-dimensional benchmark data sets in machine learning. Simulation results helped ascertain the optimal sampling technique for the ensemble, which turned out to be the sampling without replacement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机子空间集成的子采样技术比较
通过实证研究,对随机子空间集成分类器的三种子抽样技术进行了比较。为了解决高维分类的挑战,在投票组合器框架内设计了一种称为随机子样本集成的随机子空间集成版本,评估了其在三种不同采样方法(随机抽样无替换、随机抽样有替换和随机分区)下的性能。随机子样本集合使用三种不同的基础学习器实例化,包括C4.5、k近邻和naïve贝叶斯,并在机器学习中的五个高维基准数据集上进行测试。仿真结果确定了系统的最优采样技术,即不替换采样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does joint decoding really outperform cascade processing in English-to-Chinese transliteration generation? The role of syllabification The design of energy-saving filtering mechanism for sensor networks Feature-based approach combined with hierarchical classifying strategy to relation extraction The comparative study of different Bayesian classifier models New inverse halftoning using texture-and lookup table-based learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1