Dentin Disinfection Efficacy Using Four Different Irrigation Protocols

D. Jaramillo, J. L. Ibarrola, A. Arias, Phillipe Sleiman, A. Naji, D. Jaramillo
{"title":"Dentin Disinfection Efficacy Using Four Different Irrigation Protocols","authors":"D. Jaramillo, J. L. Ibarrola, A. Arias, Phillipe Sleiman, A. Naji, D. Jaramillo","doi":"10.33805/2572-6978.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to observe the effect that 3% Sodium Hypochlorite and 17% Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA) with water in between, used sequentially and individually had in the disinfection of dentin blocks that were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis. Materials and Methods: Thirty apical and coronal dentin block samples were divided into five groups (n=5): All samples were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis Group 1: Samples were submerged in 3% NaOCl then in 17% EDTA. Group 2: Samples were submerged first in 17% EDTA and then in 3% NaOCl. Group 3: Samples were immersed in 3% NaOCl only. Group 4: Samples were submerged in 17% EDTA only. Group 5 (positive control group): Samples were only submerged in distilled water. All samples were submerged in distilled water after each irrigation cycle. The irrigation protocol was repeated in all groups until all dentin samples were exposed to 24ml of the irrigating solutions. CFU units were counted and classified in an ordinal scale and compared with the linear-by-linear association test. Results: A significant linear trend in the reduction of CFU was observed when NaOCl and EDTA were combined (independently of the sequence used) when compared to groups 3 and 4 where the irrigants were used individually both in coronal (p=9.45 x 10-21), and apical slices (p=2.33 x 10-20). NaOCl was significantly more effective than EDTA in both coronal and apical slices (p ≥ 0.000001) when used alone. Conclusion: 3% Sodium Hypochlorite was more effective than 17% EDTA. However, alternating 3% NaOCl with 17% EDTA resulted in better dentinal disinfection. Clinical Relevance: Establishing an irrigation protocol that is effective in eradicating bacteria entrenched in dentinal tubules can lead to a more successful outcome in endodontically treated teeth.","PeriodicalId":165937,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research and Management","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33805/2572-6978.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to observe the effect that 3% Sodium Hypochlorite and 17% Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA) with water in between, used sequentially and individually had in the disinfection of dentin blocks that were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis. Materials and Methods: Thirty apical and coronal dentin block samples were divided into five groups (n=5): All samples were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis Group 1: Samples were submerged in 3% NaOCl then in 17% EDTA. Group 2: Samples were submerged first in 17% EDTA and then in 3% NaOCl. Group 3: Samples were immersed in 3% NaOCl only. Group 4: Samples were submerged in 17% EDTA only. Group 5 (positive control group): Samples were only submerged in distilled water. All samples were submerged in distilled water after each irrigation cycle. The irrigation protocol was repeated in all groups until all dentin samples were exposed to 24ml of the irrigating solutions. CFU units were counted and classified in an ordinal scale and compared with the linear-by-linear association test. Results: A significant linear trend in the reduction of CFU was observed when NaOCl and EDTA were combined (independently of the sequence used) when compared to groups 3 and 4 where the irrigants were used individually both in coronal (p=9.45 x 10-21), and apical slices (p=2.33 x 10-20). NaOCl was significantly more effective than EDTA in both coronal and apical slices (p ≥ 0.000001) when used alone. Conclusion: 3% Sodium Hypochlorite was more effective than 17% EDTA. However, alternating 3% NaOCl with 17% EDTA resulted in better dentinal disinfection. Clinical Relevance: Establishing an irrigation protocol that is effective in eradicating bacteria entrenched in dentinal tubules can lead to a more successful outcome in endodontically treated teeth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种不同冲洗方案对牙本质消毒效果的研究
目的:观察3%次氯酸钠和17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)(中间夹水)先后使用和单独使用对粪肠球菌污染牙本质块的消毒效果。材料与方法:将30份根尖和冠状牙本质块样品分为5组(n=5):所有样品均接种粪肠球菌(Enterococcus faecalis)。第一组:将样品浸泡在3% NaOCl中,然后浸泡在17% EDTA中。第二组:先用17% EDTA浸泡,再用3% NaOCl浸泡。第三组:样品仅浸泡在3% NaOCl中。第4组:仅用17% EDTA浸泡样品。第5组(阳性对照组):样品仅用蒸馏水浸泡。每个灌溉周期后,将所有样品浸泡在蒸馏水中。所有组重复冲洗方案,直到所有牙本质样品暴露于24ml的冲洗液中。CFU单位按顺序进行计数和分类,并与线性逐线性关联检验进行比较。结果:与分别在冠状(p=9.45 x 10-21)和根尖切片(p=2.33 x 10-20)使用冲洗剂的3组和4组相比,NaOCl和EDTA联合使用(与使用的顺序无关)可以观察到CFU降低的显著线性趋势。单独使用NaOCl时,冠状和根尖切片的疗效均显著高于EDTA (p≥0.000001)。结论:3%次氯酸钠的治疗效果优于17% EDTA。然而,3%的NaOCl与17%的EDTA交替使用效果更好。临床意义:建立一个冲洗方案,是有效的根除细菌根深蒂固的牙本质小管可以导致一个更成功的结果根管治疗的牙齿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dentin Disinfection Efficacy Using Four Different Irrigation Protocols Assessment of Oral Health Care and Knowledge amongst University Students Application of IARTI and Ameliorating Principles to Improve Compliance and Completion of Treatment in General Dental Practice Management of Mandibular Fractures: Report of Three Cases Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Silver Diamine Fluoride, Sodium Fluoride and GC Tooth Mousse Plus and Fluoride Varnish as an Antibacterial Agent in Childhood Caries: As a Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1