Is Animal-based Biomedical Research Being Used in Its Original Context?

Constança Carvalho, D. Alves, A. Knight, Luís Vicente
{"title":"Is Animal-based Biomedical Research Being Used in Its Original Context?","authors":"Constança Carvalho, D. Alves, A. Knight, Luís Vicente","doi":"10.1163/9789004391192_017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the second half of the twentieth century, non-human animals (herein­ after referred to as animals) have been widely used as models for researching human disorders. Historically, this occurred for two main reasons: a) animals are complex living systems; and b) it is considered less ethically-contentious as well as easier, quicker, and cheaper to use animals than humans. Their ben­ efit for biomedical advancement is assumed even though systematic evalua­ tions, though uncommon, suggest otherwise. It is crucial to evaluate whether animal-based biomedical research successfully benefits medical research­ even through indirect pathways-or if it is being used merely to justify further animal-based research. In this chapter we demonstrate that there is a lack of communication between animal-based research and clinical research. We dis­ cuss possible reasons for this and reflect on whether animal use in biomedical research is, indeed, fulfilling its primary purpose. Humans share a long evolutionary story with the rest of the animal king­ dom, which explains common physiological and behavioral traits and ad­ aptations. For example, basal ganglia, a set of subcortical nuclei involved in","PeriodicalId":138056,"journal":{"name":"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391192_017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Since the second half of the twentieth century, non-human animals (herein­ after referred to as animals) have been widely used as models for researching human disorders. Historically, this occurred for two main reasons: a) animals are complex living systems; and b) it is considered less ethically-contentious as well as easier, quicker, and cheaper to use animals than humans. Their ben­ efit for biomedical advancement is assumed even though systematic evalua­ tions, though uncommon, suggest otherwise. It is crucial to evaluate whether animal-based biomedical research successfully benefits medical research­ even through indirect pathways-or if it is being used merely to justify further animal-based research. In this chapter we demonstrate that there is a lack of communication between animal-based research and clinical research. We dis­ cuss possible reasons for this and reflect on whether animal use in biomedical research is, indeed, fulfilling its primary purpose. Humans share a long evolutionary story with the rest of the animal king­ dom, which explains common physiological and behavioral traits and ad­ aptations. For example, basal ganglia, a set of subcortical nuclei involved in
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于动物的生物医学研究是否在其原始背景下使用?
自20世纪下半叶以来,非人类动物(以下简称动物)已被广泛用作研究人类疾病的模型。从历史上看,发生这种情况有两个主要原因:a)动物是复杂的生命系统;b)使用动物比使用人类更容易、更快捷、更便宜,在伦理上的争议更少。它们对生物医学进步的益处被认为是存在的,尽管系统评估(尽管不常见)表明并非如此。评估以动物为基础的生物医学研究是否成功地有益于医学研究——即使是通过间接途径——或者它是否仅仅被用来证明进一步以动物为基础的研究是合理的,这是至关重要的。在本章中,我们证明了动物研究和临床研究之间缺乏交流。我们讨论了可能的原因,并反思在生物医学研究中使用动物是否确实实现了其主要目的。人类与动物王国的其他动物有着共同的漫长进化历程,这也解释了人类共同的生理和行为特征以及适应性。例如,基底神经节,一组皮层下核参与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethics, Efficacy, and Decision-making in Animal Research How Can the Final Goal of Completely Replacing Animal Procedures Successfully Be Achieved? Rethinking the 3Rs: From Whitewashing to Rights Humane Education: The Tool for Scientific Revolution in Brazil The Changing Paradigm in Preclinical Toxicology: in vitro and in silico Methods in Liver Toxicity Evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1