Redressing the Municipal Affairs with Digital Spatial Data Towards Responsible Land Governance

Shamsuddin Ahmed
{"title":"Redressing the Municipal Affairs with Digital Spatial Data Towards Responsible Land Governance","authors":"Shamsuddin Ahmed","doi":"10.17265/1548-6605/2017.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research offers a basis for spatial data management case in point that the land governance strategy denoting as a routine of digital spatial data legacy development is a major stipulation to the “land resources” and the “community services”. Until 2015, Ontario’s municipalities cover just 17% of its landmass where the municipal affairs pace complications in land use reckoned to the seven provincial plans. The Greater Golden Horseshoe Growth Plan often cloaks the multi-jurisdictional constraints, for example, the amendment of the municipal zoning ordinance, land registry and surveys, land claims and conciliations, and housing options and taxations. The emphasis is to contour: first, identification of the key attributes and entity-sets; second, structuring of the geo-relational database connecting the local activities at the dissemination areas; and finally, the thematic features of each municipality and their contiguity. On the contrary, responsible land governance in municipal affairs is obviously substance at least to the three central obligations such as approach in integrated land management, shared periphery negotiation for economic and environmental growth moratoria, and digital data automation properties and protocols. The suggestion is that a massive development of digital spatial data is necessary to readdress the municipal affairs toward responsible land governance.","PeriodicalId":135506,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Urban Design & Planning (Topic)","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Urban Design & Planning (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2017.04.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research offers a basis for spatial data management case in point that the land governance strategy denoting as a routine of digital spatial data legacy development is a major stipulation to the “land resources” and the “community services”. Until 2015, Ontario’s municipalities cover just 17% of its landmass where the municipal affairs pace complications in land use reckoned to the seven provincial plans. The Greater Golden Horseshoe Growth Plan often cloaks the multi-jurisdictional constraints, for example, the amendment of the municipal zoning ordinance, land registry and surveys, land claims and conciliations, and housing options and taxations. The emphasis is to contour: first, identification of the key attributes and entity-sets; second, structuring of the geo-relational database connecting the local activities at the dissemination areas; and finally, the thematic features of each municipality and their contiguity. On the contrary, responsible land governance in municipal affairs is obviously substance at least to the three central obligations such as approach in integrated land management, shared periphery negotiation for economic and environmental growth moratoria, and digital data automation properties and protocols. The suggestion is that a massive development of digital spatial data is necessary to readdress the municipal affairs toward responsible land governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用数字空间数据解决市政事务,实现负责任的土地治理
土地治理战略作为数字空间数据遗产开发的一种常规,是对“土地资源”和“社区服务”的重大规范,为空间数据管理提供了实证依据。直到2015年,安大略省的自治市只覆盖了其国土面积的17%,市政事务在土地使用方面的复杂性被认为是七个省级计划的一部分。大金马蹄铁增长计划往往掩盖了多司法管辖区的限制,例如,修订市政分区条例、土地登记和调查、土地索赔和调解、住房选择和税收。重点是轮廓:首先,关键属性和实体集的识别;第二,构建连接传播地区当地活动的地理关系数据库;最后,每个城市的主题特征及其相邻性。相反,在市政事务中负责任的土地治理显然至少是三个核心义务的实质内容,如综合土地管理方法,经济和环境增长暂停的共享外围谈判,以及数字数据自动化属性和协议。建议是大规模发展数字空间数据是必要的,以解决市政事务向负责任的土地治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circular Economy Planning that Address the Conditions of Climatic Extremes: 2060-Global Warming; 2090-2100 New Ice Age Infrastructure Upgrades and Lead Exposure: Do Cities Face Trade-Offs When Replacing Water Mains? Who Cares About #citydevelopment: Determinants of City Development Social Sustainability through Social Interaction — A National Survey on Community Gardens in Germany Tradable Earthquake Certificates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1