Application and Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and XGBoost on Alzheimer's Disease

Xinyu Sun
{"title":"Application and Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and XGBoost on Alzheimer's Disease","authors":"Xinyu Sun","doi":"10.1145/3448748.3448765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a kind of brain disease, which causes abnormal memory loss, thought chaos, and behavior confusion. There are still no effective methods or medicine to prevent the worsening of AD. The best way at present is to reduce the risk of getting AD. In this paper, the author constructs an artificial neural network (ANN) and XGBoost to determine whether or not a person gets AD, by analyzing how related factors impact the group a person belonging to. The Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) longitudinal MRI data were analyzed cross age, gender, education, social economic status (SES), mini mental state examination (MMSE), estimated total intracranial volume (eTIV), clinical dementia rating (CDR), normalized whole brain volume (nBWV), and atlas scaling factor (ASF). The purpose of this study is to decide whether a person is demented or not by comparing two classic methods, thus to explore the advantages and disadvantages of two models in real world application. The analysis is helpful to predict and model the different features in non-demented and demented people, therefore giving a clearer perspective for reducing people's risk of dementia by making appropriate adjustments. The accuracy of testing with ANN is 89.3%, with 37 matched non-demented and 30 matched demented out of 75 observations, which is 20% testing set. The accuracy of fitting the data is 93.3% for XGBoost, with 38 matched non-demented and 32 matched demented out of 75 observations. K-fold cross validation is applied to improve the accuracy rate. The accuracy is then improved to 95.6% for ANN and 99.6% for XGBoost. In conclusion, the result is consistent with the former literature study, showing that the machine learning method is more accurate than deep learning.","PeriodicalId":115821,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3448748.3448765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a kind of brain disease, which causes abnormal memory loss, thought chaos, and behavior confusion. There are still no effective methods or medicine to prevent the worsening of AD. The best way at present is to reduce the risk of getting AD. In this paper, the author constructs an artificial neural network (ANN) and XGBoost to determine whether or not a person gets AD, by analyzing how related factors impact the group a person belonging to. The Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) longitudinal MRI data were analyzed cross age, gender, education, social economic status (SES), mini mental state examination (MMSE), estimated total intracranial volume (eTIV), clinical dementia rating (CDR), normalized whole brain volume (nBWV), and atlas scaling factor (ASF). The purpose of this study is to decide whether a person is demented or not by comparing two classic methods, thus to explore the advantages and disadvantages of two models in real world application. The analysis is helpful to predict and model the different features in non-demented and demented people, therefore giving a clearer perspective for reducing people's risk of dementia by making appropriate adjustments. The accuracy of testing with ANN is 89.3%, with 37 matched non-demented and 30 matched demented out of 75 observations, which is 20% testing set. The accuracy of fitting the data is 93.3% for XGBoost, with 38 matched non-demented and 32 matched demented out of 75 observations. K-fold cross validation is applied to improve the accuracy rate. The accuracy is then improved to 95.6% for ANN and 99.6% for XGBoost. In conclusion, the result is consistent with the former literature study, showing that the machine learning method is more accurate than deep learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工神经网络与XGBoost在阿尔茨海默病中的应用及比较
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种脑部疾病,它会导致异常的记忆丧失、思维混乱和行为混乱。目前仍没有有效的方法或药物来预防阿尔茨海默病的恶化。目前最好的办法是降低患阿尔茨海默病的风险。本文通过分析相关因素对个体所属群体的影响,构建人工神经网络(ANN)和XGBoost来判断个体是否患有AD。对开放获取影像研究系列(OASIS)纵向MRI数据进行跨年龄、性别、教育程度、社会经济地位(SES)、迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、估计总颅内容量(eTIV)、临床痴呆评分(CDR)、标准化全脑容量(nBWV)和寰椎比例因子(ASF)的分析。本研究的目的是通过比较两种经典的方法来判断一个人是否痴呆,从而探讨两种模型在实际应用中的优缺点。该分析有助于对非痴呆和痴呆人群的不同特征进行预测和建模,从而为通过适当调整来降低人们患痴呆的风险提供更清晰的视角。人工神经网络测试的准确率为89.3%,75个观测值中有37个匹配的非痴呆,30个匹配的痴呆,这是20%的测试集。XGBoost的数据拟合精度为93.3%,在75个观测值中有38个匹配的非痴呆和32个匹配的痴呆。采用K-fold交叉验证提高准确率。ANN的准确率提高到95.6%,XGBoost的准确率提高到99.6%。综上所述,结果与之前的文献研究一致,表明机器学习方法比深度学习更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Picard Versions for Analyzing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Study on Dispatching Model of Block Economy Based-Data Mining A Modified HOG Algorithm based on the Prewitt Operator RNA-seq Reveals the Increased Risk of Heart and Cardiovascular Disease by SARS-CoV-2 Infection Curative Effect of Tongyu Decoction on Neurological Deficit and Rehabilitation Effect of Patients with Cerebral Hemorrhage in Recovery Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1