{"title":"The rise of contemporary china and Wilhelmine Germany: Challanges of productive analogy","authors":"I. Pejic, S. Blagojevic","doi":"10.2298/medjp2301093p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of a land power that is trying to develop its maritime forces has\n been viewed as an important conflict instigator among great powers. Great\n Britain shared similar concerns with the rise of Germany at the beginning of\n the 20th century. Power relations among states in East Asia, during last two\n decades, share many similarities with those of pre-World War I Europe. This\n historical analogy provides abundant information regarding the behavior of\n land and maritime states. On the other hand, the analogy is often used\n without reference to other great powers in the system and how these states\n influenced the overall balance of power. In other words, we get the notion\n that the conflict between land and maritime power is inevitable regardless\n of other actors and their position in the system. In our work we shall focus\n our attention on the two processes that are balance of power and balance of\n threat; and try to understand how these mechanisms affected the politics of\n key actors in Europe before the Great War and how they affect the politics\n of contemporary states in East Asia. Since we are discussing the balance of\n power concept the article follows ideas set forth by authors of realism.\n Comparing different approaches of great powers to balancing in the years\n before the Great War and what balancing looks like in contemporary East Asia\n we shall try to point out to some strategic misconceptions regarding this\n historical analogy.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2301093p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rise of a land power that is trying to develop its maritime forces has
been viewed as an important conflict instigator among great powers. Great
Britain shared similar concerns with the rise of Germany at the beginning of
the 20th century. Power relations among states in East Asia, during last two
decades, share many similarities with those of pre-World War I Europe. This
historical analogy provides abundant information regarding the behavior of
land and maritime states. On the other hand, the analogy is often used
without reference to other great powers in the system and how these states
influenced the overall balance of power. In other words, we get the notion
that the conflict between land and maritime power is inevitable regardless
of other actors and their position in the system. In our work we shall focus
our attention on the two processes that are balance of power and balance of
threat; and try to understand how these mechanisms affected the politics of
key actors in Europe before the Great War and how they affect the politics
of contemporary states in East Asia. Since we are discussing the balance of
power concept the article follows ideas set forth by authors of realism.
Comparing different approaches of great powers to balancing in the years
before the Great War and what balancing looks like in contemporary East Asia
we shall try to point out to some strategic misconceptions regarding this
historical analogy.