Farmers’ risk rating and crop portfolio choice in Kewot Woreda, North Ethiopia

M. Harun, B. Legesse
{"title":"Farmers’ risk rating and crop portfolio choice in Kewot Woreda, North Ethiopia","authors":"M. Harun, B. Legesse","doi":"10.22194/jgias/11.1039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Production risk and marketing risks are considered as critical factors in shaping farm decisions. This study is concerned with assessing crop risk rating by farmers and its impact on their crop portfolio choice. 392 farmers who were selected using “Multi-stage Random Sampling” technique and qualitative data from focus group discussions were employed in the analysis. The risk rating was done using a three-stage rank and Ordinary Least Square econometric regression was applied to identify the determinant factors. The study found sorghum, teff, onion and mung bean as major crops covering 95% of the total cultivated land. Results from descriptive statistics revealed that 73% of the respondents prioritize marketing over consumption in their crop choice decisions. Mung bean was identified as a riskier crop while onion risk rating showed higher variation among respondents. Findings on determinants of riskiness of the farmers’ crop portfolio choice showed that livestock ownership, education and number of crop types found positively associated with riskier crop portfolio while irrigation use and gender of the household head associate with portfolio riskiness negatively. The major contribution of this study is its explicit treatment of farmers own risk rating and farmers also rated crops not grown by them. The key policy implication is that to manage marketing issue better and achieve optimal crop choice, there is a need to develop marketing insurance and promote pre-contract for riskier crops. Keywords: Risk variation, consumption decision, contract, farm household, insurance","PeriodicalId":303968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22194/jgias/11.1039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Production risk and marketing risks are considered as critical factors in shaping farm decisions. This study is concerned with assessing crop risk rating by farmers and its impact on their crop portfolio choice. 392 farmers who were selected using “Multi-stage Random Sampling” technique and qualitative data from focus group discussions were employed in the analysis. The risk rating was done using a three-stage rank and Ordinary Least Square econometric regression was applied to identify the determinant factors. The study found sorghum, teff, onion and mung bean as major crops covering 95% of the total cultivated land. Results from descriptive statistics revealed that 73% of the respondents prioritize marketing over consumption in their crop choice decisions. Mung bean was identified as a riskier crop while onion risk rating showed higher variation among respondents. Findings on determinants of riskiness of the farmers’ crop portfolio choice showed that livestock ownership, education and number of crop types found positively associated with riskier crop portfolio while irrigation use and gender of the household head associate with portfolio riskiness negatively. The major contribution of this study is its explicit treatment of farmers own risk rating and farmers also rated crops not grown by them. The key policy implication is that to manage marketing issue better and achieve optimal crop choice, there is a need to develop marketing insurance and promote pre-contract for riskier crops. Keywords: Risk variation, consumption decision, contract, farm household, insurance
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚北部Kewot wooreda农民的风险评级和作物组合选择
生产风险和销售风险被认为是影响农场决策的关键因素。本研究关注农民评估作物风险等级及其对作物组合选择的影响。采用“多阶段随机抽样”技术和焦点小组讨论的定性数据对392名农民进行分析。采用三阶段秩法进行风险评级,并采用普通最小二乘计量经济回归确定决定因素。研究发现,高粱、苔麸、洋葱和绿豆是主要作物,占总耕地的95%。描述性统计的结果显示,73%的受访者在选择作物时优先考虑营销而不是消费。绿豆被认为是风险较高的作物,而洋葱的风险评级在受访者中差异较大。关于农民作物组合选择风险决定因素的研究结果表明,牲畜拥有量、教育程度和作物类型数量与风险较高的作物组合呈正相关,而灌溉使用和户主性别与风险组合负相关。这项研究的主要贡献在于它明确地处理了农民自己的风险评级,农民也对他们不种植的作物进行了评级。关键的政策含义是,为了更好地管理营销问题并实现最优作物选择,需要开发营销保险并促进风险较高作物的预合同。关键词:风险变异,消费决策,契约,农户,保险
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appraisal of some granular insecticides against yellow-stem borer and Crop Water Productivity of Rice under two irrigation regimes Response of barley to nano-feeding with seaweed extract and bio-fertilizer Community food insecurity and role of agriculture extension in rural development Farmers and pastoralists’ socio-cultural interaction: mitigating conflicts in rural communities for livelihood development in Nigeria The use of remote sensing technology in defining the water depth in the lakes and water bodies: Western Iraq as a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1