KEWENANGAN KEJAKSAAN DALAM MENGAJUKAN PERMOHONAN PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN (Suatu Penelitian di Kabupaten Aceh Besar)

Mardiyah Mardiyah, Azhari Yahya
{"title":"KEWENANGAN KEJAKSAAN DALAM MENGAJUKAN PERMOHONAN PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN (Suatu Penelitian di Kabupaten Aceh Besar)","authors":"Mardiyah Mardiyah, Azhari Yahya","doi":"10.22373/LEGITIMASI.V7I1.3967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to know the authority of the public prosecutor in applying the cancellation of marriage application at Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho. Article 22 of the Act Number 1, 1974 on Marriage states that a marriage bond might be cancelled if it failed to fulfill the requirement. However, in the practice at the Mahkamah Syariyah Jantho, the prosecutor has never been conducted such authority. This research aims to explore the reasons of the Public Prosecution Office has never been applying for the invalid marriage and legal consequence for the prosecution office when it fails to conduct its duties. This is field research, by using a juridical empirical approach. The research findings are the public prosecution office might apply for r the marriage cancellation towards marriage as ruled in Article 23 point c of the Marriage Act due to reasons for the Prosecution Office that has never been applying is due to the reason that there is no special explanation regarding the matter and there is different perception. The Prosecution Office or the prosecutor but it has implication over the ignorance of not applying the cancellation of marriage. Thus in terms of keeping the law is working, and preventing the offense committed in the future and there is legal certainty amongst people there should be  a common goal and aims in imposing law by law enforcers in responding the authority and the position of the public prosecution office  in applying the application of marriage cancellation.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/LEGITIMASI.V7I1.3967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research aims to know the authority of the public prosecutor in applying the cancellation of marriage application at Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho. Article 22 of the Act Number 1, 1974 on Marriage states that a marriage bond might be cancelled if it failed to fulfill the requirement. However, in the practice at the Mahkamah Syariyah Jantho, the prosecutor has never been conducted such authority. This research aims to explore the reasons of the Public Prosecution Office has never been applying for the invalid marriage and legal consequence for the prosecution office when it fails to conduct its duties. This is field research, by using a juridical empirical approach. The research findings are the public prosecution office might apply for r the marriage cancellation towards marriage as ruled in Article 23 point c of the Marriage Act due to reasons for the Prosecution Office that has never been applying is due to the reason that there is no special explanation regarding the matter and there is different perception. The Prosecution Office or the prosecutor but it has implication over the ignorance of not applying the cancellation of marriage. Thus in terms of keeping the law is working, and preventing the offense committed in the future and there is legal certainty amongst people there should be  a common goal and aims in imposing law by law enforcers in responding the authority and the position of the public prosecution office  in applying the application of marriage cancellation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检察官对婚姻无效申请的权力(大亚齐地区的一项研究)
本研究的目的是了解公诉人在Mahkamah Syar 'iyah Jantho申请取消婚姻申请时的权威。1974年关于婚姻的第1号法案第22条规定,如果婚姻关系未能满足要求,则可以取消婚姻关系。但是,在马哈马的做法中,检察官从未获得过这种权力。本研究旨在探讨检察机关在未能履行其职责时从未申请无效婚姻的原因及其法律后果。这是一项实地研究,采用了司法实证方法。调查结果显示,检察机关对《婚姻法》第23条第3项规定的婚姻解除申请,可能是由于从未提出申请的检察机关对该事件没有特别的解释,而且有不同的看法。检察院或检察官,但这对不适用取消婚姻的无知有暗示。因此,为了保持法律的有效性,防止未来的犯罪行为,以及人们之间的法律确定性,执法人员在实施法律时应该有一个共同的目标和目的,以回应公共检察机关在应用取消婚姻的应用方面的权威和立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fiqh and Siyasa Model of Integration: A Study of The Constitution of The Sultanate of Aceh Darussalam Sayam: Implementing Customary Law in The Resolution of Persecution Criminal Cases in Aceh Tipologi Pemikiran Fikih Nahdhatul Ulama Pendekatan White Collar Crime: Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Pembayaran Upah Dibawah Minimum Implementasi Rehabilitasi Medis dan Sosial Terhadap Narapidana Narkotika Pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1