Hedging Pension Longevity Risk: Practical Capital Markets Solutions

Guy D. Coughlan, D. Epstein, M. Khalaf-Allah, C. Watts
{"title":"Hedging Pension Longevity Risk: Practical Capital Markets Solutions","authors":"Guy D. Coughlan, D. Epstein, M. Khalaf-Allah, C. Watts","doi":"10.2202/2153-3792.1030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Longevity risk transfer via the capital markets is now a reality. Pension plans and annuity providers can hedge longevity risk with capital markets instruments, reflecting the emergence of a new market that is poised to take off. The key players in this market are hedgers (pension plans and annuity providers), intermediaries (investment banks and broker-dealers) and end investors (ILS funds, hedge funds, endowments, etc.). We argue that the development of liquidity in this market depends on the acceptance of longevity indices and the development of standardized instruments to transfer this risk.Until now, hedgers of longevity risk have almost exclusively approached the subject from the perspective of indemnification (100 percent risk transfer). We propose an alternative approach based on a risk management paradigm that does not require 100 percent risk transfer and is consistent with the way in which other pension-related risks are managed. To this end we present a framework for longevity hedging cantered on standardized indexbased hedges. This framework uses a building-block approach in which standardized hedge building blocks are combined to provide a longevity hedge tailored to the specific demographics, benefit structure and mortality table of any pension plan. The effectiveness of this hedge is maximized by careful calibration of the mix of building blocks and then verified in hedge effectiveness tests.We also discuss customized longevity hedges that will be preferred by some hedgers, who are unconcerned by the lower liquidity and onerous requirements for data disclosure associated with these hedges, and are prepared to pay the additional premium above the cost of a standardized hedge.","PeriodicalId":244368,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/2153-3792.1030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Longevity risk transfer via the capital markets is now a reality. Pension plans and annuity providers can hedge longevity risk with capital markets instruments, reflecting the emergence of a new market that is poised to take off. The key players in this market are hedgers (pension plans and annuity providers), intermediaries (investment banks and broker-dealers) and end investors (ILS funds, hedge funds, endowments, etc.). We argue that the development of liquidity in this market depends on the acceptance of longevity indices and the development of standardized instruments to transfer this risk.Until now, hedgers of longevity risk have almost exclusively approached the subject from the perspective of indemnification (100 percent risk transfer). We propose an alternative approach based on a risk management paradigm that does not require 100 percent risk transfer and is consistent with the way in which other pension-related risks are managed. To this end we present a framework for longevity hedging cantered on standardized indexbased hedges. This framework uses a building-block approach in which standardized hedge building blocks are combined to provide a longevity hedge tailored to the specific demographics, benefit structure and mortality table of any pension plan. The effectiveness of this hedge is maximized by careful calibration of the mix of building blocks and then verified in hedge effectiveness tests.We also discuss customized longevity hedges that will be preferred by some hedgers, who are unconcerned by the lower liquidity and onerous requirements for data disclosure associated with these hedges, and are prepared to pay the additional premium above the cost of a standardized hedge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对冲养老金长寿风险:实用的资本市场解决方案
通过资本市场转移长寿风险已成为现实。养老金计划和年金提供商可以用资本市场工具对冲长寿风险,这反映了一个即将起飞的新市场的出现。这个市场的主要参与者是对冲者(养老金计划和年金提供商)、中介机构(投资银行和经纪交易商)和最终投资者(ILS基金、对冲基金、捐赠基金等)。我们认为,该市场流动性的发展取决于对寿命指数的接受程度和标准化工具的发展来转移这种风险。到目前为止,长寿风险的对冲者几乎完全是从赔偿的角度来处理这个问题的(100%的风险转移)。我们提出了一种基于风险管理范式的替代方法,该方法不需要100%的风险转移,并且与其他养老金相关风险的管理方式一致。为此,我们提出了一个以标准化指数对冲为中心的长寿对冲框架。该框架使用了一种构建块方法,将标准化的对冲构建块组合在一起,为任何养老金计划的特定人口统计、福利结构和死亡率表提供量身定制的长寿对冲。这种对冲的有效性是通过仔细校准构建块的混合,然后在对冲有效性测试验证最大化。我们还讨论了一些套期保值者将首选的定制长寿套期保值,他们不关心与这些套期保值相关的较低流动性和繁重的数据披露要求,并准备支付高于标准化套期保值成本的额外溢价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimating Risk Relativity of Driving Records using Generalized Additive Models: A Statistical Approach for Auto Insurance Rate Regulation Assessing the Impact of Climate Risk Stresses on Life Insurance Portfolios The Risk of Natural Catastrophe in Early America: Perspectives from the Phoenix Assurance Company London and Nascent US Insurers Frontmatter Special Issue: History of Insurance in a Global Perspective: A Novel Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1