The Task Demonstration Model: a concurrent model for teaching groups of students with severe disabilities.

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Exceptional Children Pub Date : 1992-09-01 DOI:10.1177/001440299205900106
K G Karsh, A C Repp
{"title":"The Task Demonstration Model: a concurrent model for teaching groups of students with severe disabilities.","authors":"K G Karsh,&nbsp;A C Repp","doi":"10.1177/001440299205900106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the use of the Task Demonstration Model (TDM) of group instruction for students with severe or moderate retardation. This model and the Standard Prompting Hierarchy (SPH) were tested against each other (and baseline) across three teachers and groups of students. Results on teacher variables showed that demands and praise were roughly equivalent for both procedures, but prompts were 12 times higher in SPH than in TDM. Data on student variables showed task engagement to be the same for SPH and TDM, percent correct to be 10% higher in TDM, but rate correct to be twice as much in TDM as in SPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"59 1","pages":"54-67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001440299205900106","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299205900106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This study investigated the use of the Task Demonstration Model (TDM) of group instruction for students with severe or moderate retardation. This model and the Standard Prompting Hierarchy (SPH) were tested against each other (and baseline) across three teachers and groups of students. Results on teacher variables showed that demands and praise were roughly equivalent for both procedures, but prompts were 12 times higher in SPH than in TDM. Data on student variables showed task engagement to be the same for SPH and TDM, percent correct to be 10% higher in TDM, but rate correct to be twice as much in TDM as in SPH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
任务示范模型:一种面向重度残疾学生的并行教学模型。
本研究探讨了任务示范模型(TDM)在重度或中度智障学生小组教学中的应用。该模型和标准提示层次(SPH)在三位教师和学生群体中相互对照(和基线)进行了测试。教师变量的结果显示,两种方法的要求和表扬大致相当,但SPH的提示比TDM高12倍。关于学生变量的数据显示,SPH和TDM的任务参与度是相同的,TDM的正确率高出10%,但TDM的正确率是SPH的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
期刊最新文献
Factors Predicting Sustained Implementation of Tier 2 and Tier 3 Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Who Are We Measuring? Teacher Effects in Gifted and Talented Teacher Rating Scales Situating Ourselves in Coalitions With and for Exceptional Children: Editors’ Introduction Differences in Loneliness Experiences Among High-Ability Students: Individual and Social Context Predictors Single-Case Effect Size Distributions for Interventions Designed to Improve Engagement in Elementary Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1