Grading secondary vocational education students with disabilities: a national perspective.

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Exceptional Children Pub Date : 1992-09-01 DOI:10.1177/001440299205900107
J W Rojewski, R R Pollard, G D Meers
{"title":"Grading secondary vocational education students with disabilities: a national perspective.","authors":"J W Rojewski,&nbsp;R R Pollard,&nbsp;G D Meers","doi":"10.1177/001440299205900107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A nationwide purposive sample of secondary vocational educators completed a questionnaire that examined practices and perceptions toward grading students with disabilities. A variety of grading methods was reportedly used, but over two-thirds of respondents included a competency-based grading component. An overwhelming majority believed that student effort should be used to determine grades. Two-thirds of vocational educators had never been involved in their students' IEP development. The most common changes teachers have made over time in their grading practices included becoming more flexible and individualized in grading. Overall, teachers displayed moderately positive attitudes toward grading students with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"59 1","pages":"68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001440299205900107","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299205900107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

A nationwide purposive sample of secondary vocational educators completed a questionnaire that examined practices and perceptions toward grading students with disabilities. A variety of grading methods was reportedly used, but over two-thirds of respondents included a competency-based grading component. An overwhelming majority believed that student effort should be used to determine grades. Two-thirds of vocational educators had never been involved in their students' IEP development. The most common changes teachers have made over time in their grading practices included becoming more flexible and individualized in grading. Overall, teachers displayed moderately positive attitudes toward grading students with disabilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中等职业教育残疾学生评分:一个国家视角。
全国中等职业教育工作者有目的的样本完成了一份调查问卷,调查了对残疾学生评分的做法和看法。据报道,使用了各种评分方法,但超过三分之二的受访者包括基于能力的评分部分。绝大多数人认为学生的努力应该用来决定成绩。三分之二的职业教育工作者从未参与过学生的IEP发展。随着时间的推移,教师在评分实践中最常见的变化包括在评分中变得更加灵活和个性化。总体而言,教师对残疾学生评分表现出适度的积极态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
期刊最新文献
Examining STEM Preferences in Autistic Students: The Role of Contextual Support, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations An Open Letter to the Field: Contemplating Special Education's Collaborative Role in Developing Inclusive Education A Descriptive Portrait of the Paraeducator Workforce in Washington State Ethnoracial Diversity of the Special Educator Workforce Over Time Deeping the Commitment to Our Editorial Vision and Recognizing Areas for Comprehensive Reform in Special Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1