An Audit of the Infection Prevention and Control Program at a Regional Hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

N. Poobalan, Chetty Sivathasen, Saman Selvarajah
{"title":"An Audit of the Infection Prevention and Control Program at a Regional Hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa","authors":"N. Poobalan, Chetty Sivathasen, Saman Selvarajah","doi":"10.36349/easjms.2023.v05i03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infectious diseases are the leading cause of death in South Africa. Containment strategy includes infection prevention and control (IPC) programs, microbiological resistance testing, and antibiotic stewardship programs. The current study evaluates the IPC program at the rural regional Port Shepstone Hospital. Objective: To use the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC’s) IPC tool for acute hospitals to evaluate the infection control program at Port Shepstone Hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted from February to March 2018 at Port Shepstone Hospital. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage determined which of the CDC’s core components of an IPC program were operational. In the second stage, in 11 adult long-stay wards, nurses were identified for completion of selected elements of the CDC tool. Results: The IPC at Port Shepstone Hospital practices 10 of the 17 elements of the CDC’s Infection Control Assessment Tool. The highest scoring ward was gynaecology (110/119 (95%)). The lowest was the psychiatric ward, which scored 64/119 (53%). There was a lack of internal auditing practices. Conclusion: Port Shepstone Hospital IPC program is limited as only some of the components are practised. The lack of internal auditing practices is concerning and needs improvement. To achieve the proper application of the IPC program more emphasis needs to be placed on constantly auditing existing practices and giving feedback to staff coupled with relevant training and resource support. This can be facilitated by hospital management allocating resources to IPC audit teams to audit and share findings with departments and develop quality improvement programs.","PeriodicalId":446681,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjms.2023.v05i03.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infectious diseases are the leading cause of death in South Africa. Containment strategy includes infection prevention and control (IPC) programs, microbiological resistance testing, and antibiotic stewardship programs. The current study evaluates the IPC program at the rural regional Port Shepstone Hospital. Objective: To use the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC’s) IPC tool for acute hospitals to evaluate the infection control program at Port Shepstone Hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted from February to March 2018 at Port Shepstone Hospital. The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage determined which of the CDC’s core components of an IPC program were operational. In the second stage, in 11 adult long-stay wards, nurses were identified for completion of selected elements of the CDC tool. Results: The IPC at Port Shepstone Hospital practices 10 of the 17 elements of the CDC’s Infection Control Assessment Tool. The highest scoring ward was gynaecology (110/119 (95%)). The lowest was the psychiatric ward, which scored 64/119 (53%). There was a lack of internal auditing practices. Conclusion: Port Shepstone Hospital IPC program is limited as only some of the components are practised. The lack of internal auditing practices is concerning and needs improvement. To achieve the proper application of the IPC program more emphasis needs to be placed on constantly auditing existing practices and giving feedback to staff coupled with relevant training and resource support. This can be facilitated by hospital management allocating resources to IPC audit teams to audit and share findings with departments and develop quality improvement programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省一家地区医院感染预防和控制项目的审计
背景:传染病是南非的主要死亡原因。控制战略包括感染预防和控制(IPC)规划、微生物耐药性检测和抗生素管理规划。目前的研究评估了农村地区谢普斯通港医院的IPC项目。目的:利用美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)急性医院感染控制工具(IPC)对谢泼斯通港医院感染控制方案进行评价。材料与方法:于2018年2月至3月在Port Shepstone医院进行前瞻性描述性研究。这项研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段确定疾病预防控制中心IPC计划的哪些核心组成部分正在运作。在第二阶段,在11个成人长期住院病房中,确定护士完成CDC工具的选定要素。结果:谢普斯通港医院的IPC执行了疾病预防控制中心感染控制评估工具17项要素中的10项。得分最高的科室为妇科(110/119(95%))。精神病区得分最低,为64/119(53%)。缺乏内部审计实践。结论:谢泼斯顿港医院IPC项目仅实施了部分内容,存在一定的局限性。内部审计实务的缺失令人担忧,需要改进。为了实现IPC程序的正确应用,需要更加强调不断审核现有做法,并向员工提供反馈,同时提供相关培训和资源支持。这可以通过医院管理层将资源分配给IPC审核小组进行审核并与各部门分享发现并制定质量改进计划来促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bacteremias in Intensive Care Unit: A Two-Year Retrospective Study Early Puerperium Gangrenous Sigmoid Volvulus: Case Report Respiratory Distress in Children Aged 6 to 59 Months at the Pediatric Department of the Csref of Commune V of Bamako: Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Incidence, Risk Factors and Mortality of COVID-19 among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis Heartache to Happiness: Managing a Six Year Hormonal Subfertility with a Successful Rate of Conception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1