Scope

Shaun Nichols
{"title":"Scope","authors":"Shaun Nichols","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commonsense, as well as experimental psychology, indicates that there are subtle distinctions in the normative domain. Many people, both adults and children, think that it’s worse to produce a bad consequence than to allow it and that it’s worse to produce a bad consequence with intent than to produce it with mere foreknowledge. People also often think that it’s forbidden to treat people of their own community in a certain way, but not that it’s forbidden to treat people in other communities in that way. It has been unclear exactly how these distinctions arise in ordinary moral thought. This chapter draws on the “size principle,” which is implicated in word learning, to explain how children would use scant and equivocal evidence to acquire these aspects of moral systems.","PeriodicalId":383766,"journal":{"name":"Rational Rules","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rational Rules","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commonsense, as well as experimental psychology, indicates that there are subtle distinctions in the normative domain. Many people, both adults and children, think that it’s worse to produce a bad consequence than to allow it and that it’s worse to produce a bad consequence with intent than to produce it with mere foreknowledge. People also often think that it’s forbidden to treat people of their own community in a certain way, but not that it’s forbidden to treat people in other communities in that way. It has been unclear exactly how these distinctions arise in ordinary moral thought. This chapter draws on the “size principle,” which is implicated in word learning, to explain how children would use scant and equivocal evidence to acquire these aspects of moral systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
范围
常识和实验心理学都表明,在规范领域中存在着微妙的区别。很多人,包括成年人和孩子,都认为产生坏结果比允许坏结果发生更糟糕,有意图产生坏结果比仅仅有预见产生坏结果更糟糕。人们也经常认为用某种方式对待自己社区的人是被禁止的,但并不认为用这种方式对待其他社区的人是被禁止的。目前还不清楚这些区别究竟是如何在普通道德思想中产生的。本章借鉴了“大小原则”,这与单词学习有关,解释了儿童如何使用缺乏和模棱两可的证据来获得道德体系的这些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rationality and Morality Closure Scope Moral Empiricism Priors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1