Flexible Yet Firm: The Practice of the AAT and the Courts in Reviewing ASIC S 206F Management Disqualification Orders

R. Bowley
{"title":"Flexible Yet Firm: The Practice of the AAT and the Courts in Reviewing ASIC S 206F Management Disqualification Orders","authors":"R. Bowley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3250262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Section 206F of the Corporations Act (2001) provides ASIC with a cheap and flexible enforcement power to disqualify for up to five years persons who have been involved in managing two or more failed companies within a seven year period. Individuals who have been disqualified under s 206F may challenge such disqualifications through the merits review process at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), and in further limited circumstances, through the courts. This article examines the 36 AAT decisions that have determined challenges to the corporate regulator’s disqualification orders. It shows that whilst the Tribunal has set aside or varied around half of these disqualification orders (based in several cases on the consideration of fresh evidence), the Tribunal has nevertheless demonstrated a firm approach to upholding standards of responsible corporate management in those disqualification orders that it has affirmed. The article concludes by outlining potential reforms to s 206F to further enhance the effectiveness of this provision in deterring insolvent trading and ensuring responsible corporate management practices.","PeriodicalId":174628,"journal":{"name":"English Law: Business (Topic)","volume":"12 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Law: Business (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3250262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Section 206F of the Corporations Act (2001) provides ASIC with a cheap and flexible enforcement power to disqualify for up to five years persons who have been involved in managing two or more failed companies within a seven year period. Individuals who have been disqualified under s 206F may challenge such disqualifications through the merits review process at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), and in further limited circumstances, through the courts. This article examines the 36 AAT decisions that have determined challenges to the corporate regulator’s disqualification orders. It shows that whilst the Tribunal has set aside or varied around half of these disqualification orders (based in several cases on the consideration of fresh evidence), the Tribunal has nevertheless demonstrated a firm approach to upholding standards of responsible corporate management in those disqualification orders that it has affirmed. The article concludes by outlining potential reforms to s 206F to further enhance the effectiveness of this provision in deterring insolvent trading and ensuring responsible corporate management practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灵活而坚定:AAT和法院在审查ASIC S 206F管理取消资格令中的做法
公司法(2001)第206F条为ASIC提供了一种廉价而灵活的执法权力,可以在七年内参与管理两家或两家以上破产公司的人员取消长达五年的资格。根据第206F条被取消资格的个人可通过行政上诉审裁处(AAT)的案情审查程序对取消资格提出质疑,在进一步有限的情况下,可通过法院提出质疑。本文研究了36个AAT决定,这些决定决定了对公司监管机构取消资格命令的挑战。它表明,虽然法庭撤销或改变了大约一半的这些取消资格令(在若干案件中基于对新证据的考虑),但法庭在其确认的这些取消资格令中仍表现出坚定的态度,坚持负责任的公司管理标准。文章最后概述了对第206F条可能进行的改革,以进一步提高该条款在阻止破产交易和确保负责任的公司管理实践方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19: Assessing Some Potential Global Economic, Business and Legal Impacts The Pursuit to Defeat Underwriter Opportunism: A Comparative Analysis of Combating Misconduct in the Claims Process The Impact of Case Law on the Duty of Trust and Confidence in the English Legal System Parent Company Direct Liability for Overseas Human Rights Violations: Lessons from the UK Supreme Court Applying Economics to the Internet: Can Regulators and Competition Authorities Keep Pace?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1