Introduction: MNCs and their pathways of influence in global politics

J. Mikler, K. Ronit
{"title":"Introduction: MNCs and their pathways of influence in global politics","authors":"J. Mikler, K. Ronit","doi":"10.4337/9781789903232.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multinational corporations (MNCs) have been active for a very long time in global markets and they also play a leading role in global politics, although the latter side of their activity has been far more contentious and often difficult to map. The traditional and dominant focus on states and their interests and strategies has generally marginalized the role of corporations, or at least the study of them. The result is that while some might be tempted to declare that what is and is not possible in global politics is an answer along the lines of ‘it’s the economy, stupid’,1 it could be more accurate to say ‘it’s the MNCs, stupid!’ The role of MNCs needs to be considered when analyzing key issues in contemporary global politics. Of course, many alternative approaches exist, bringing the operations and interests of MNCs closer to our attention and informing research. However, scholarly work on MNCs tends largely to pull in two different directions. On the one hand, there is an economics and management literature concerned with analyzing the behavior of MNCs in terms of economic statistics and organizational forms. On the other hand, there is a politics and international relations literature that views their activities through the prisms of grand power politics. In the process, they go somewhat ‘missing’ between studies that detail a variety of economic and industrial properties of MNCs, versus those that discuss different dimensions of corporate power in terms of market forces, class relations, ideologies, national interests, international relations and so on. When it comes to political studies of MNCs the result is that ‘instead of mountains of scholarly achievement, we have a few oases in an arid landscape’ (Wilks, 2013, p. 2). While acknowledging that the various analyses of MNCs’ operations are enormously helpful and reveal important aspects of corporate conduct, the contributors to this collection aim to further bridge the extant scholarly cleavages to examine the many and intricate ways MNCs influence politics in the global realm. They combine firm-centered and institutional approaches and, as","PeriodicalId":197379,"journal":{"name":"MNCs in Global Politics","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MNCs in Global Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903232.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multinational corporations (MNCs) have been active for a very long time in global markets and they also play a leading role in global politics, although the latter side of their activity has been far more contentious and often difficult to map. The traditional and dominant focus on states and their interests and strategies has generally marginalized the role of corporations, or at least the study of them. The result is that while some might be tempted to declare that what is and is not possible in global politics is an answer along the lines of ‘it’s the economy, stupid’,1 it could be more accurate to say ‘it’s the MNCs, stupid!’ The role of MNCs needs to be considered when analyzing key issues in contemporary global politics. Of course, many alternative approaches exist, bringing the operations and interests of MNCs closer to our attention and informing research. However, scholarly work on MNCs tends largely to pull in two different directions. On the one hand, there is an economics and management literature concerned with analyzing the behavior of MNCs in terms of economic statistics and organizational forms. On the other hand, there is a politics and international relations literature that views their activities through the prisms of grand power politics. In the process, they go somewhat ‘missing’ between studies that detail a variety of economic and industrial properties of MNCs, versus those that discuss different dimensions of corporate power in terms of market forces, class relations, ideologies, national interests, international relations and so on. When it comes to political studies of MNCs the result is that ‘instead of mountains of scholarly achievement, we have a few oases in an arid landscape’ (Wilks, 2013, p. 2). While acknowledging that the various analyses of MNCs’ operations are enormously helpful and reveal important aspects of corporate conduct, the contributors to this collection aim to further bridge the extant scholarly cleavages to examine the many and intricate ways MNCs influence politics in the global realm. They combine firm-centered and institutional approaches and, as
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引言:跨国公司及其在全球政治中的影响途径
跨国公司(MNCs)在全球市场上活跃了很长一段时间,它们也在全球政治中发挥着主导作用,尽管它们活动的后一方面更具争议性,而且往往难以描绘。传统的、占主导地位的对国家及其利益和战略的关注,已经普遍边缘化了企业的作用,或者至少是对企业的研究。结果是,虽然有些人可能会忍不住宣称,在全球政治中,什么是可能的,什么是不可能的,答案是“这是经济,笨蛋”,但更准确的说法可能是“这是跨国公司,笨蛋!”在分析当代全球政治中的关键问题时,需要考虑跨国公司的作用。当然,存在许多替代方法,使我们更关注跨国公司的运营和利益,并为研究提供信息。然而,关于跨国公司的学术研究在很大程度上倾向于两个不同的方向。一方面,有经济学和管理学文献关注从经济统计和组织形式的角度分析跨国公司的行为。另一方面,有一种政治和国际关系文学,通过大国政治的棱镜来看待他们的活动。在这个过程中,他们在研究跨国公司的各种经济和工业特性的细节与从市场力量、阶级关系、意识形态、国家利益、国际关系等方面讨论公司权力的不同维度之间有些“缺失”。当涉及到跨国公司的政治研究时,结果是“不是学术成就的高山,我们在干旱的景观中有一些绿洲”(威尔克斯,2013年,第2页)。虽然承认对跨国公司运营的各种分析非常有帮助,并揭示了公司行为的重要方面,但本书的作者旨在进一步弥合现有的学术分歧,以研究跨国公司在全球领域影响政治的许多复杂方式。它们结合了以公司为中心和机构的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and power: the role of the Big Four in the competitive disharmonization of global corporate tax avoidance regulations Introduction: MNCs and their pathways of influence in global politics Preface and acknowledgments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1