Dementia with Lewy bodies

Olivia Salthouse, J. Bradshaw, M. Saling
{"title":"Dementia with Lewy bodies","authors":"Olivia Salthouse, J. Bradshaw, M. Saling","doi":"10.4324/9781351208918-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical Medicine. 1 In my own practice I have seen a similar case. A diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) was suspected based on clinical history, collateral history and clinical examination, previous episodes of delirium, lack of response to treatment of identified causes of delirium and the protracted nature of the delirium. The patient was too unwell to undergo a dopamine transporter scan and the patient was trialled on rivastigmine with an excellent response. The patient was discharged home. The published case highlights various aspects of the management of delirium. It is worth referring to the recently published Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline for risk reduction and the management of delirium. 2 The recommended tool for detection of delirium is the 4AT based on a comparison of different tools, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards for delirium recommend assessing all those at risk newly admitted to hospital or long-term care. 2,3 It is worth noting that the investigation of acute and chronic cognitive impairment differ. For delirium the SIGN guidelines recommend good history, collateral history, clinical examination (including neurological) followed by basic and targeted investigations. The recommendation for computed tomography brain relates to various ‘red flags’ in the acute situation and for further consideration of brain imaging in the case of non-resolving delirium or where there are features to suggest primary nervous system pathology. Similarly, the NICE guidelines for dementia have clear guidance on assessment and investigation strategy in suspected dementia, which includes recommendations around imaging. 4 Some of the investigations listed in the approach to investigation by Akintade and Pierres, for example, autoantibodies would be appropriate only when a cause for delirium has not been found, the presentation is unusual or when not resolving as was the case for the patient presented. It is also worth emphasising that anti-psychotics would not be recommended first line in the management of delirium unless there is intractable distress, risk of harm to the patient or others and when benefits of these medications outweigh potential harms. Non-pharmacological treatment options should always be implemented first, use of more than one pharmacological agent would not be recommended, and it should be noted that only haloperidol is licensed for use in delirium when used without other drugs that prolong QT interval on electrocardiogram. 2 I would also like to highlight that it has been increasingly recognised in the literature that in some cases of delirium there may be a diagnostic opportunity for DLB. 5,6 It has been suggested that a delirium-like illness may be a prodrome to a diagnosis of DLB. 7 This presentation by Akintade and Pierres is welcome in that DLB as a differential diagnosis for delirium that fails to resolve or is recurrent is highlighted. ■","PeriodicalId":430016,"journal":{"name":"Degenerative Disorders of the Brain","volume":"449 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"128","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Degenerative Disorders of the Brain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351208918-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 128

Abstract

Clinical Medicine. 1 In my own practice I have seen a similar case. A diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) was suspected based on clinical history, collateral history and clinical examination, previous episodes of delirium, lack of response to treatment of identified causes of delirium and the protracted nature of the delirium. The patient was too unwell to undergo a dopamine transporter scan and the patient was trialled on rivastigmine with an excellent response. The patient was discharged home. The published case highlights various aspects of the management of delirium. It is worth referring to the recently published Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline for risk reduction and the management of delirium. 2 The recommended tool for detection of delirium is the 4AT based on a comparison of different tools, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards for delirium recommend assessing all those at risk newly admitted to hospital or long-term care. 2,3 It is worth noting that the investigation of acute and chronic cognitive impairment differ. For delirium the SIGN guidelines recommend good history, collateral history, clinical examination (including neurological) followed by basic and targeted investigations. The recommendation for computed tomography brain relates to various ‘red flags’ in the acute situation and for further consideration of brain imaging in the case of non-resolving delirium or where there are features to suggest primary nervous system pathology. Similarly, the NICE guidelines for dementia have clear guidance on assessment and investigation strategy in suspected dementia, which includes recommendations around imaging. 4 Some of the investigations listed in the approach to investigation by Akintade and Pierres, for example, autoantibodies would be appropriate only when a cause for delirium has not been found, the presentation is unusual or when not resolving as was the case for the patient presented. It is also worth emphasising that anti-psychotics would not be recommended first line in the management of delirium unless there is intractable distress, risk of harm to the patient or others and when benefits of these medications outweigh potential harms. Non-pharmacological treatment options should always be implemented first, use of more than one pharmacological agent would not be recommended, and it should be noted that only haloperidol is licensed for use in delirium when used without other drugs that prolong QT interval on electrocardiogram. 2 I would also like to highlight that it has been increasingly recognised in the literature that in some cases of delirium there may be a diagnostic opportunity for DLB. 5,6 It has been suggested that a delirium-like illness may be a prodrome to a diagnosis of DLB. 7 This presentation by Akintade and Pierres is welcome in that DLB as a differential diagnosis for delirium that fails to resolve or is recurrent is highlighted. ■
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
路易体痴呆
临床医学1 .我在行医中也见过类似的病例。根据临床病史、旁系病史和临床检查、既往谵妄发作、对确定的谵妄原因治疗缺乏反应以及谵妄的延续性,怀疑诊断为路易体痴呆(DLB)。患者太不舒服,无法进行多巴胺转运体扫描,患者接受了利瓦斯汀的试验,反应很好。病人出院回家了。发表的案例强调了谵妄管理的各个方面。值得参考的是最近出版的苏格兰校际指导网络(SIGN)关于降低风险和管理谵妄的指南。基于不同工具的比较,推荐的谵妄检测工具是4AT,国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)谵妄质量标准建议评估所有新入院或长期护理的高危患者。2,3值得注意的是,急性和慢性认知障碍的调查不同。对于谵妄,SIGN指南推荐良好的病史,侧支病史,临床检查(包括神经学),然后进行基础和有针对性的调查。建议对急性情况下的各种“危险信号”进行脑计算机断层扫描,并进一步考虑在非溶解性谵妄或有原发性神经系统病理特征的情况下进行脑成像。同样,NICE痴呆指南对疑似痴呆的评估和调查策略也有明确的指导,其中包括有关影像学的建议。在Akintade和Pierres的调查方法中列出的一些调查,例如,自身抗体只有在没有发现谵妄的原因,表现不寻常或不能解决的情况下才适用。同样值得强调的是,除非存在难治性痛苦、对患者或他人造成伤害的风险以及这些药物的益处大于潜在危害,否则抗精神病药物不应被推荐用于谵妄的一线治疗。非药物治疗方案应首先实施,不建议使用一种以上的药物,并且应该注意的是,只有氟哌啶醇在没有其他延长心电图QT间期的药物的情况下被许可用于谵妄。我还想强调的是,文献中越来越多地认识到,在某些谵妄病例中,可能存在诊断DLB的机会。5,6有人认为,谵妄样疾病可能是诊断DLB的前驱症状。Akintade和Pierres的报告是受欢迎的,因为DLB作为谵妄的鉴别诊断,未能解决或反复强调。■
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parkinson’s disease Multiple sclerosis Motor neuron disease Huntington’s disease Dementia with Lewy bodies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1