Temperature monitoring during Laser Ablation by FBG sensors encapsulated within a metallic needle: Experiments on healthy swine tissue

E. Schena, P. Saccomandi, C. Massaroni, V. Quattrocchi, G. Frauenfelder, F. Giurazza, S. Silvestri, M. Caponero, A. Polimadei
{"title":"Temperature monitoring during Laser Ablation by FBG sensors encapsulated within a metallic needle: Experiments on healthy swine tissue","authors":"E. Schena, P. Saccomandi, C. Massaroni, V. Quattrocchi, G. Frauenfelder, F. Giurazza, S. Silvestri, M. Caponero, A. Polimadei","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring of local temperature in tissue undergoing Laser Ablation (LA) could be particularly beneficial to optimize treatment outcomes. A number of both invasive and non-invasive thermometric techniques may be employed to perform this task. Among others, Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors show the following valuable characteristics for temperature monitoring during LA: good sensitivity and accuracy, and immunity from electromagnetic interferences. The main drawbacks are their intrinsic invasiveness and the sensitivity to strain, which can entail measurement error for respiratory and patient movements. The aim of this work is to experimental assess the characteristics of an FBG sensor, housed within a metallic needle, employed in temperature monitoring of tissue undergoing LA. The use of a metallic needle allows neglecting errors due to patient movements, but induces an increase in sensor response time and a temperature overestimation due to direct absorption of laser light by the needle. The proposed sensor is tested during LA of ex vivo swine livers, and the tissue temperature measured by the FBG housed within the needle is compared to the temperature measured by an FBG without needle. This comparison showed that the needle induces a temperature overestimation, strongly dependent on the distance between sensor and laser applicator (e.g., about 2 °C at 6 mm, 4.4 °C at 4 mm). Furthermore, the needle causes an increase of response time (about 140 ms vs 40 ms). Since this response time is sufficient for the particular application and the overestimation can be reduced by using different techniques of data processing, the use of a needle to protect FBG seems to be a feasible solution to overcome the concern related to patient movements.","PeriodicalId":277757,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings","volume":"134 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Monitoring of local temperature in tissue undergoing Laser Ablation (LA) could be particularly beneficial to optimize treatment outcomes. A number of both invasive and non-invasive thermometric techniques may be employed to perform this task. Among others, Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors show the following valuable characteristics for temperature monitoring during LA: good sensitivity and accuracy, and immunity from electromagnetic interferences. The main drawbacks are their intrinsic invasiveness and the sensitivity to strain, which can entail measurement error for respiratory and patient movements. The aim of this work is to experimental assess the characteristics of an FBG sensor, housed within a metallic needle, employed in temperature monitoring of tissue undergoing LA. The use of a metallic needle allows neglecting errors due to patient movements, but induces an increase in sensor response time and a temperature overestimation due to direct absorption of laser light by the needle. The proposed sensor is tested during LA of ex vivo swine livers, and the tissue temperature measured by the FBG housed within the needle is compared to the temperature measured by an FBG without needle. This comparison showed that the needle induces a temperature overestimation, strongly dependent on the distance between sensor and laser applicator (e.g., about 2 °C at 6 mm, 4.4 °C at 4 mm). Furthermore, the needle causes an increase of response time (about 140 ms vs 40 ms). Since this response time is sufficient for the particular application and the overestimation can be reduced by using different techniques of data processing, the use of a needle to protect FBG seems to be a feasible solution to overcome the concern related to patient movements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用金属针封装的光纤光栅传感器监测激光消融过程中的温度:对健康猪组织的实验
在接受激光消融(LA)的组织中监测局部温度可能特别有利于优化治疗结果。可采用许多侵入性和非侵入性测温技术来执行这项任务。其中,光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)传感器在LA过程中具有以下宝贵的特性:良好的灵敏度和精度,以及抗电磁干扰。主要的缺点是它们固有的侵入性和对应变的敏感性,这可能导致呼吸和患者运动的测量误差。这项工作的目的是实验评估光纤光栅传感器的特性,安置在金属针,用于温度监测组织进行LA。金属针的使用可以忽略由于患者运动引起的误差,但由于针直接吸收激光,导致传感器响应时间增加和温度高估。该传感器在离体猪肝的LA过程中进行了测试,并将针头内的FBG测量的组织温度与没有针头的FBG测量的温度进行了比较。这一比较表明,针诱导温度高估,强烈依赖于传感器和激光施加器之间的距离(例如,约2°C在6毫米,4.4°C在4毫米)。此外,针引起响应时间的增加(大约140毫秒vs 40毫秒)。由于该响应时间对于特定应用来说是足够的,并且可以通过使用不同的数据处理技术来减少高估,因此使用针来保护FBG似乎是克服与患者运动相关的担忧的可行解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Needle detection by electro-localization for a needle EMG exam robotic simulator Evaluation of control modes for head motion-based control with motion sensors A novel automatically initialized level set approach based on region correlation for lumbar vertebrae CT image segmentation Smart environments using near-field communication and HTML5 New FEM 3D model for arm-cuff interface simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1