Efficient techniques for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

T. ChandanaMadhuri, D. UmaBhanu, P. Mounika, B. Ganesh, Shaik Mujafar, P. Harika, N. Kameshwari, Shaik Faizan Ali
{"title":"Efficient techniques for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","authors":"T. ChandanaMadhuri, D. UmaBhanu, P. Mounika, B. Ganesh, Shaik Mujafar, P. Harika, N. Kameshwari, Shaik Faizan Ali","doi":"10.26452/ijds.v6i1.1249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, in a generation of technological improvements, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (L.C.) is the selection for the treatment of symptomatic illnesses of gallbladder like cholecystitis and cholelithiasis. Legitimate pain control is essential for advancing scientific outcomes and previous ambulation after surgery. Results aren't suitable for daycare surgeries. It is minimally invasive with much less postoperative ache, rapid recuperation, lesser health facility live and return to everyday interest on the earliest1. Though laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a slightly invasive surgical procedure with more secondary perioperative pain scores assessment to open procedures, it is present with enormous ranges of postoperative ache. The present prospective, unmarried blinded, randomized manipulate study protected sixty patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and aimed to compare the postoperative analgesia between the posterior transversus abdominis plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis aircraft block. The patients were randomly allotted to 2 businesses- Group 1 consisted of patients who received posterior T.A.P. block with zero. 2% Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg and Group 2 consisted of patients who obtained subcostal T.A.P. block with zero.2% Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg. All patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. At the quit of the surgical operation earlier than extubation, both one of the blocks were executed on the affected person underneath ultrasound steering by the identical anaesthesiologist. The objectives of the study were to compare the postoperative pain relief based on VAS at rest and VAS at deep breathing, to compare the time taken for the administration of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia) and to compare the time taken to perform the block.","PeriodicalId":156957,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatopathology and Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatopathology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26452/ijds.v6i1.1249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, in a generation of technological improvements, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (L.C.) is the selection for the treatment of symptomatic illnesses of gallbladder like cholecystitis and cholelithiasis. Legitimate pain control is essential for advancing scientific outcomes and previous ambulation after surgery. Results aren't suitable for daycare surgeries. It is minimally invasive with much less postoperative ache, rapid recuperation, lesser health facility live and return to everyday interest on the earliest1. Though laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a slightly invasive surgical procedure with more secondary perioperative pain scores assessment to open procedures, it is present with enormous ranges of postoperative ache. The present prospective, unmarried blinded, randomized manipulate study protected sixty patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and aimed to compare the postoperative analgesia between the posterior transversus abdominis plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis aircraft block. The patients were randomly allotted to 2 businesses- Group 1 consisted of patients who received posterior T.A.P. block with zero. 2% Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg and Group 2 consisted of patients who obtained subcostal T.A.P. block with zero.2% Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg. All patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. At the quit of the surgical operation earlier than extubation, both one of the blocks were executed on the affected person underneath ultrasound steering by the identical anaesthesiologist. The objectives of the study were to compare the postoperative pain relief based on VAS at rest and VAS at deep breathing, to compare the time taken for the administration of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia) and to compare the time taken to perform the block.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术后有效的镇痛技术
今天,在技术进步的时代,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(L.C.)是治疗胆囊炎和胆石症等胆囊症状疾病的选择。合理的疼痛控制对于推进科学成果和手术后的先前活动至关重要。结果不适合日托手术。它是微创的,术后疼痛少得多,恢复快,医疗设施少,最早恢复日常生活1。虽然腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种微创手术,其围手术期疼痛评分评估比开放式手术更多,但其术后疼痛范围很大。本研究是一项前瞻性、未婚、盲法、随机操作的研究,对60例计划行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行保护,目的是比较后腹横平面阻滞和肋下腹横平面阻滞的术后镇痛效果。患者被随机分为两组:第一组患者接受后路tap阻断治疗。2%罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定1mcg/kg,第二组为肋下T.A.P.阻滞为零的患者。2%罗哌卡因加右美托咪定1mcg/kg。所有患者均在全身麻醉下行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。在拔管前手术结束时,由同一麻醉师在超声指导下对患者进行两种阻滞。本研究的目的是比较静息时和深呼吸时基于VAS的术后疼痛缓解,比较给予抢救性镇痛所需的时间(镇痛持续时间)和进行阻滞所需的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of Chronic Foot Ulcers for diabetic patients A Study of Chronic Foot Ulcers for Diabetic Patients Efficient techniques for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy A Prospective Study on Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia A Study on Various Approaches of Functional Outcome of Distal Femur Fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1