Il peso delle emozioni nell’argomentazione sui social media

Goffredo Guidi, Gianmarco Tuccini
{"title":"Il peso delle emozioni nell’argomentazione sui social media","authors":"Goffredo Guidi, Gianmarco Tuccini","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media are nowadays fertile ground for debates that are often rich in arguments of persuasive value. In the present writing, we hypothesize that emotions play a significant role in determining the success of arguments on social media. In order to validate the hypothesis, we analyzed Change My View, an Internet forum on Reddit where the persuasiveness of the discussions among participants is explicit and regulated by specific norms. Our analysis revealed that arguments enjoying a higher degree of success were characterized by two particular emotions: anticipation and joy, which we interpret as belonging to engagement, a more general emotional dimension that includes them both. Such characteristics of successful arguments lead us to consider the persuasive experience on social media as analogous to a playful experience. Like in a game, in order to successfully take part in such a persuasive experience, certain requirements are needed: commitment and respect for the rules as well as joyful participation.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media are nowadays fertile ground for debates that are often rich in arguments of persuasive value. In the present writing, we hypothesize that emotions play a significant role in determining the success of arguments on social media. In order to validate the hypothesis, we analyzed Change My View, an Internet forum on Reddit where the persuasiveness of the discussions among participants is explicit and regulated by specific norms. Our analysis revealed that arguments enjoying a higher degree of success were characterized by two particular emotions: anticipation and joy, which we interpret as belonging to engagement, a more general emotional dimension that includes them both. Such characteristics of successful arguments lead us to consider the persuasive experience on social media as analogous to a playful experience. Like in a game, in order to successfully take part in such a persuasive experience, certain requirements are needed: commitment and respect for the rules as well as joyful participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感在社交媒体争论中的分量
如今,社交媒体是辩论的沃土,这些辩论往往富含有说服力的论点。在本文中,我们假设情绪在决定社交媒体上争论的成功方面发挥着重要作用。为了验证这一假设,我们分析了Reddit上的一个互联网论坛Change My View,在这个论坛上,参与者之间讨论的说服力是明确的,并受到特定规范的约束。我们的分析显示,争论的成功程度较高,其特征是两种特殊的情绪:期待和喜悦,我们将其解释为参与,这是一种更普遍的情感维度,包括了这两种情绪。成功论点的这些特征使我们认为社交媒体上的说服体验类似于游戏体验。就像在游戏中一样,为了成功地参与这种有说服力的体验,需要一些条件:承诺和尊重规则以及快乐的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Puer bonus communicandi peritus. Esercizi e strumenti per dibattere tra pari Il dibattito come rischio educativo A Rhetorical Model of Debating Improving Argumentative Skills in Education: Three Online Discussion Tools Odyssey' Scientific Debate: Rhetoric STEM Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1