Identity Matters: Indonesia’s approach towards territorial disputes in South-east Asia

D. Prasetya, Peggy Puspa Haffsari, Heavy Nala Estriani
{"title":"Identity Matters: Indonesia’s approach towards territorial disputes in South-east Asia","authors":"D. Prasetya, Peggy Puspa Haffsari, Heavy Nala Estriani","doi":"10.1080/09733159.2020.1836775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT After gaining independence in 1945, Indonesia’s foreign policy demonstrated an active role in resolving maritime disputes in South-east Asia. The settlement effort is inseparable from the role of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as the cornerstone of Indonesia’s foreign policy. In responding to the maritime boundary disputes in the South-east Asian region, for instance, Indonesia relates to the ASEAN “spirit of dialogue”, which emphasises the principles of diplomacy, negotiations and cooperation in conducting peaceful settlements. However, under Joko Widodo’s administration, Indonesia did not always prioritise its institutional aspects in responding to maritime conflicts in South-east Asia. In some cases, Indonesia acts unilaterally, especially when the case concerns its maritime identity. This article will try to examine Indonesia’s approach towards territorial disputes under Jokowi’s administration, by asking two questions: (1) Is Indonesia’s approach towards territorial disputes more institutionalist or realist? (2) If both apply, to what extent has Indonesia become institutionalist or realist? By using a constructivist approach, this article argues that Indonesia embraces two identities that function hierarchically. Indonesia identifies itself first as a maritime nation, and second as a regional leader. When it comes to settling sea territorial disputes, Indonesia’s geopolitical behaviour has always been shadowed by the maritime nation identity.","PeriodicalId":342704,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2020.1836775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT After gaining independence in 1945, Indonesia’s foreign policy demonstrated an active role in resolving maritime disputes in South-east Asia. The settlement effort is inseparable from the role of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as the cornerstone of Indonesia’s foreign policy. In responding to the maritime boundary disputes in the South-east Asian region, for instance, Indonesia relates to the ASEAN “spirit of dialogue”, which emphasises the principles of diplomacy, negotiations and cooperation in conducting peaceful settlements. However, under Joko Widodo’s administration, Indonesia did not always prioritise its institutional aspects in responding to maritime conflicts in South-east Asia. In some cases, Indonesia acts unilaterally, especially when the case concerns its maritime identity. This article will try to examine Indonesia’s approach towards territorial disputes under Jokowi’s administration, by asking two questions: (1) Is Indonesia’s approach towards territorial disputes more institutionalist or realist? (2) If both apply, to what extent has Indonesia become institutionalist or realist? By using a constructivist approach, this article argues that Indonesia embraces two identities that function hierarchically. Indonesia identifies itself first as a maritime nation, and second as a regional leader. When it comes to settling sea territorial disputes, Indonesia’s geopolitical behaviour has always been shadowed by the maritime nation identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身份问题:印尼对东南亚领土争端的态度
1945年获得独立后,印尼的外交政策在解决东南亚海洋争端中发挥了积极作用。解决问题的努力与作为印度尼西亚外交政策基石的东南亚国家联盟(东盟)的作用密不可分。例如,在对东南亚区域的海洋边界争端作出反应时,印度尼西亚与东盟的“对话精神”有关,这种精神强调外交、谈判和合作原则以进行和平解决。然而,在佐科·维多多(Joko Widodo)政府的领导下,印尼在应对东南亚海上冲突时并不总是优先考虑其制度方面。在某些情况下,印度尼西亚单方面采取行动,特别是在涉及其海洋身份的情况下。本文将试图通过提出两个问题来审视印尼在佐科威政府下处理领土争端的方式:(1)印尼处理领土争端的方式更倾向于制度主义还是现实主义?(2)如果两者都适用,印尼在多大程度上成为制度主义或现实主义?本文运用建构主义的方法,认为印尼拥有两种具有等级功能的身份。印尼首先将自己定位为一个海洋国家,其次是地区领导者。在解决海上领土争端方面,印尼的地缘政治行为一直受到海洋国家身份的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable fishery: Combating IUU fishing through people's participation to ensure environmental justice China in South China Sea: Evolving geopolitical interests and opportunism Bangladesh in India’s maritime strategy towards the Bay of Bengal: Towards a comprehensive Indo-Pacific outlook India-China rivalry: Asymmetric no longer Project Green Ports: Are Indian ports on the right track?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1