{"title":"Risk Sharing Capacity: Markets versus Households","authors":"H. Gersbach, H. Haller","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2376375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce uncertainty in our general equilibrium model with multi-member groups, following the classical state-space approach of Arrow-Debreu. A host of new interesting economic issues emerge. First, risk averse agents can attempt to insure themselves through markets or through mutual insurance within a multi-member group, say a household, by pooling resources within the group. Which insurance mechanism is chosen and to which extent the mechanisms substitute or complement each other is an open question. Second, one may ask more specifically what is the role of social groups for risk sharing and risk allocation when agents face idiosyncratic or aggregate risk. Third, does a suitable combination of social group formation and contingent commodity markets yield efficient risk allocations? We present a series of examples that shed some light on these issues.","PeriodicalId":371090,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics - Microeconometric Models of Household Behavior (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics - Microeconometric Models of Household Behavior (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2376375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We introduce uncertainty in our general equilibrium model with multi-member groups, following the classical state-space approach of Arrow-Debreu. A host of new interesting economic issues emerge. First, risk averse agents can attempt to insure themselves through markets or through mutual insurance within a multi-member group, say a household, by pooling resources within the group. Which insurance mechanism is chosen and to which extent the mechanisms substitute or complement each other is an open question. Second, one may ask more specifically what is the role of social groups for risk sharing and risk allocation when agents face idiosyncratic or aggregate risk. Third, does a suitable combination of social group formation and contingent commodity markets yield efficient risk allocations? We present a series of examples that shed some light on these issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险分担能力:市场与家庭
根据经典的阿罗-德布鲁状态空间方法,在多成员群一般均衡模型中引入不确定性。一系列新的有趣的经济问题出现了。首先,厌恶风险的代理人可以尝试通过市场或一个多成员群体(比如一个家庭)内的相互保险,在群体内汇集资源,为自己投保。选择哪种保险机制,以及机制在多大程度上相互替代或互补是一个悬而未决的问题。其次,人们可能会更具体地问,当代理人面临特殊或总体风险时,社会群体在风险分担和风险分配方面的作用是什么。第三,社会群体形成和偶然商品市场的适当组合是否能产生有效的风险配置?我们提供了一系列的例子来阐明这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wage Risk and Portfolio Choice: The Role of Correlated Returns Marketing Management When Facing Forward-Looking Consumers Income Loss and Financial Distress during COVID-19: The Protective Role of Liquid Assets Hunger and the Demands for Cheap Dietary Staples of the Extreme Poor Institutional and Human-Nature Determinants of Financial Investment Behavior Across European Households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1