Are Pro-environment Behaviours Substitutes or Complements? Evidence from the Field

Raisa Sherif
{"title":"Are Pro-environment Behaviours Substitutes or Complements? Evidence from the Field","authors":"Raisa Sherif","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3799970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses a field experiment among adolescents in India to study how interventions to increase one pro-environment activity (namely, recycling single-use plastic carry bags), spill over to other pro-environment activities. I show using lab and field experiments combined with survey data that (i) providing information on the need to recycle does not change recycling behaviour, whereas (ii) providing incentives along with the information leads to higher recycling. There is a positive spillover from the incentive treatment to other pro-environment activities. This positive spillover is observed among subjects who respond to the incentives and increase recycling. Notably, the positive spillover is also observed among those in this treatment who do not respond to the incentives and do not change recycling behaviour. This provides evidence for complementarities among pro-environment behaviours and suggests that interventions may have unaccounted positive effects on non-target environment behaviours.","PeriodicalId":300059,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3799970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper uses a field experiment among adolescents in India to study how interventions to increase one pro-environment activity (namely, recycling single-use plastic carry bags), spill over to other pro-environment activities. I show using lab and field experiments combined with survey data that (i) providing information on the need to recycle does not change recycling behaviour, whereas (ii) providing incentives along with the information leads to higher recycling. There is a positive spillover from the incentive treatment to other pro-environment activities. This positive spillover is observed among subjects who respond to the incentives and increase recycling. Notably, the positive spillover is also observed among those in this treatment who do not respond to the incentives and do not change recycling behaviour. This provides evidence for complementarities among pro-environment behaviours and suggests that interventions may have unaccounted positive effects on non-target environment behaviours.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲环境行为是替代品还是补充?实地证据
本文在印度青少年中进行了一项实地实验,研究干预措施如何增加一项亲环境活动(即回收一次性塑料袋),并溢出到其他亲环境活动中。我通过实验室和实地实验结合调查数据表明(I)提供关于回收需求的信息不会改变回收行为,而(ii)在提供信息的同时提供激励措施会导致更高的回收率。激励待遇对其他环保活动有积极的溢出效应。这种积极的溢出效应在对激励措施做出反应并增加回收利用的受试者中得到了观察。值得注意的是,在那些不响应激励措施、不改变回收行为的人身上,也观察到了积极的溢出效应。这为亲环境行为之间的互补性提供了证据,并表明干预措施可能对非目标环境行为产生未解释的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is there Finally an International Tax System? Shifting Punishment on Minorities: Experimental Evidence of Scapegoating Carrots, Sticks, or Simplicity? Field Evidence on What Makes People Pay TV Fees Effective Climate Policy Needs Non-Combustion Uses for Hydrocarbons Value Creation, the Benefit Principle and Efficiency-Related Allocation of Taxing Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1