Radical transformation in global supply chains: can new business models be based on biodiversity in the agrifood industry?

S. Treyer
{"title":"Radical transformation in global supply chains: can new business models be based on biodiversity in the agrifood industry?","authors":"S. Treyer","doi":"10.4337/9781800371781.00055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The food industry has been struggling for years with its impact on the environment. The impacts of input-intensive agricultural production on nature and the environment have been made obvious since the 1960s. Silent Spring by Rachel Carson from 1962 is still an extremely vivid account of the impacts of pesticides on nature, resonating with today’s scientific reports on the effects on pollinators. The algae blooms in Brittany’s coastal waters have been linked for a long time to a structural excess of intensive farming of pigs and chickens that has brought jobs and prosperity to a region previously suffering from underdevelopment, and emigration to other French regions. This has been well known for decades, but the trends of environment degradation have still not been reversed. One obvious explanation of the inability to change is that the downward trends in prices that farmers are being paid for their products make it nearly impossible to ask them to change their practices, because their economic viability is so close to a survival threshold. This is now all well known, and the food industry knows it must do something. What is also well known in the public debate is that power and value are not fairly allocated along the supply chain: farmers have much less power and a small share of the value compared to upstream players (the input industry) or downstream players (processing and retailing) because their negotiation power is scattered and thus weak. That gives enormous responsibility to the large companies of the food industry: they are in power; they have the tools at hand to foster change in the whole supply chain. The different phases of the sustainability strategy in a company like Danone are extremely interesting in this regard. In the late 2000s, this large company in the dairy industry developed a specific innovation and exploration fund, called the Livelihoods Funds, where impact investment1 projects were explored to finance sustainable agricultural practices, landscapes and food supply chains, particularly aiming at finding solutions for carbon storage and biodiversity pro-","PeriodicalId":256332,"journal":{"name":"Standing up for a Sustainable World","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Standing up for a Sustainable World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371781.00055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The food industry has been struggling for years with its impact on the environment. The impacts of input-intensive agricultural production on nature and the environment have been made obvious since the 1960s. Silent Spring by Rachel Carson from 1962 is still an extremely vivid account of the impacts of pesticides on nature, resonating with today’s scientific reports on the effects on pollinators. The algae blooms in Brittany’s coastal waters have been linked for a long time to a structural excess of intensive farming of pigs and chickens that has brought jobs and prosperity to a region previously suffering from underdevelopment, and emigration to other French regions. This has been well known for decades, but the trends of environment degradation have still not been reversed. One obvious explanation of the inability to change is that the downward trends in prices that farmers are being paid for their products make it nearly impossible to ask them to change their practices, because their economic viability is so close to a survival threshold. This is now all well known, and the food industry knows it must do something. What is also well known in the public debate is that power and value are not fairly allocated along the supply chain: farmers have much less power and a small share of the value compared to upstream players (the input industry) or downstream players (processing and retailing) because their negotiation power is scattered and thus weak. That gives enormous responsibility to the large companies of the food industry: they are in power; they have the tools at hand to foster change in the whole supply chain. The different phases of the sustainability strategy in a company like Danone are extremely interesting in this regard. In the late 2000s, this large company in the dairy industry developed a specific innovation and exploration fund, called the Livelihoods Funds, where impact investment1 projects were explored to finance sustainable agricultural practices, landscapes and food supply chains, particularly aiming at finding solutions for carbon storage and biodiversity pro-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球供应链的彻底变革:新的商业模式能否基于农业食品行业的生物多样性?
多年来,食品行业一直在努力解决其对环境的影响。自20世纪60年代以来,投入密集型农业生产对自然和环境的影响已经很明显。雷切尔·卡森1962年的《寂静的春天》仍然生动地描述了农药对自然的影响,与今天关于传粉媒介影响的科学报告产生了共鸣。长期以来,布列塔尼沿海水域的藻类大量繁殖一直被认为与猪和鸡的集约化养殖的结构性过剩有关。这种集约化养殖给这个此前一直处于欠发达状态的地区带来了就业机会和繁荣,并带来了向法国其他地区的移民。这是几十年来众所周知的,但环境退化的趋势仍然没有扭转。对无法改变的一个明显解释是,农民购买产品的价格呈下降趋势,要求他们改变做法几乎是不可能的,因为他们的经济生存能力已如此接近生存门槛。这是众所周知的,食品行业知道它必须做些什么。在公开辩论中众所周知的是,权力和价值并没有在供应链上公平分配:与上游参与者(投入产业)或下游参与者(加工和零售)相比,农民的权力和价值份额要小得多,因为他们的谈判能力分散,因此很弱。这给食品工业的大公司带来了巨大的责任:他们掌权;他们手头有工具来促进整个供应链的变化。在这方面,达能公司可持续发展战略的不同阶段非常有趣。2000年代末,这家乳制品行业的大公司设立了一个专门的创新和探索基金,名为“生计基金”(Livelihoods Funds),探索影响投资项目,为可持续农业实践、景观和食品供应链提供资金,特别是旨在寻找碳储存和生物多样性保护的解决方案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capitalism and the curse of external effects The Paris Agreement on climate change: what legacy? Communicating biodiversity loss and its link to economics Introduction to Part V Unleashing the power of financial markets for the green transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1