Countering Overseas Power in Global Value Chains: Information Asymmetries and Subcontracting in the Plastics Industry

Michael Murphree, John Anderson
{"title":"Countering Overseas Power in Global Value Chains: Information Asymmetries and Subcontracting in the Plastics Industry","authors":"Michael Murphree, John Anderson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3239483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Resource Dependency Theory (RDT) and Global Value Chain (GVC) analysis have been deployed in the strategic and international management literatures to address questions of power in dyadic relationships and global production networks, respectively. This paper integrates the two theoretical approaches in order to expand RDT, using insights from Hirschman's exit/voice model to show the options available to some firms but not others. Using the relationship between buyers and contract manufacturers from GVC analysis, we find a correlation between firm size and choice of strategic action in response to contract manufacturers' dependence on buyers. Large firms follow an acquiescence strategy while small manufacturers follow an avoidance strategy, able to use both exit and voice strategies. Enabled by scale or control over information, both of these approaches successfully reduce uncertainty and provide a source of sustained competitive advantage. Using a study of the production chain in consumer plastics manufacturing in China, we show how dependent firms respond to GVC induced pressure. We find that based on the size of the contract manufacturer, the range of strategic responses to power is constrained by the nature of the dependency in global value chains. This opens important insights into the role that structural characteristics of organizations (like size) play in determining strategic freedom.","PeriodicalId":159491,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Empirical Studies of Firms & Industries in Transitional Economies (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Empirical Studies of Firms & Industries in Transitional Economies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3239483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Abstract Resource Dependency Theory (RDT) and Global Value Chain (GVC) analysis have been deployed in the strategic and international management literatures to address questions of power in dyadic relationships and global production networks, respectively. This paper integrates the two theoretical approaches in order to expand RDT, using insights from Hirschman's exit/voice model to show the options available to some firms but not others. Using the relationship between buyers and contract manufacturers from GVC analysis, we find a correlation between firm size and choice of strategic action in response to contract manufacturers' dependence on buyers. Large firms follow an acquiescence strategy while small manufacturers follow an avoidance strategy, able to use both exit and voice strategies. Enabled by scale or control over information, both of these approaches successfully reduce uncertainty and provide a source of sustained competitive advantage. Using a study of the production chain in consumer plastics manufacturing in China, we show how dependent firms respond to GVC induced pressure. We find that based on the size of the contract manufacturer, the range of strategic responses to power is constrained by the nature of the dependency in global value chains. This opens important insights into the role that structural characteristics of organizations (like size) play in determining strategic freedom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全球价值链中对抗海外力量:塑料工业的信息不对称和分包
资源依赖理论(RDT)和全球价值链(GVC)分析分别在战略和国际管理文献中用于解决二元关系和全球生产网络中的权力问题。本文整合了两种理论方法,以扩展RDT,使用赫希曼的退出/声音模型的见解来展示一些公司可用的选项,而不是其他公司。利用全球价值链分析的买方与合同制造商之间的关系,我们发现企业规模与合同制造商对买方依赖的战略行动选择之间存在相关性。大公司遵循默认策略,而小制造商遵循回避策略,能够同时使用退出和声音策略。通过对信息的规模或控制,这两种方法都成功地减少了不确定性,并提供了持续竞争优势的来源。通过对中国消费塑料制造业生产链的研究,我们展示了依赖企业如何应对全球价值链带来的压力。我们发现,基于合同制造商的规模,对权力的战略反应范围受到全球价值链依赖性质的限制。这开启了对组织结构特征(如规模)在决定战略自由中所起作用的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corruption and Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Cross-country Analysis What Determines Leverage in Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe in the Automotive Industry Supplier Search and Rematching in Global Sourcing - Theory and Evidence from China Countering Overseas Power in Global Value Chains: Information Asymmetries and Subcontracting in the Plastics Industry Foreign Direct Investment and the Development of the Automotive Industry in Eastern and Southern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1