{"title":"Supplemental Feeding Of Birds In Human Settlements Of Western Poland","authors":"Karolina Chosińska, Leszek Duduś, Z. Jakubiec","doi":"10.1515/isspar-2015-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Humans are probably the only species which obtain satisfaction from helping other species, including the feeding of animals. Since the end of the XIX century it has been proposed to feed birds, but only in the recent decades – due to the massive growth of urban populations with an accompanying increase of the urban areas and the synanthropisation and urbanisation of many animal species – bird feeding became more common and can be conducted throughout the year. In supplemental feeding of birds we can distinguish between targeted actions and involuntary actions. Among ornithologists two extreme attitudes are apparent: The suggestion to completely abandon feeding and stop providing nest boxes on the one hand, and the strong propagation of both supplementary feeding and putting up nest boxes to enrich the composition and abundance of birds on the other hand (Berthold and Mohr 2008). The results of several studies indicate that supplemental feeding of birds must follow specified rules (Berthold and Mohr 2008, Graszka-Petrykowski 2008, Szokalski and Wojtatowicz 1989). This view has been commonly accepted now. In cities species inhabiting the built-up and green areas as well as water birds are usually fed (Berthold and Mohr 2008). Despite the fact that the problem of feeding birds has been studied often an in depth in Western Europe and North America, in Poland there are no publications on this topic so far. Supplemental feeding of birds has also biological consequences, increasing survival and breeding success in the next season (Doerr and Silvy 2002, Robb et al. 2008).","PeriodicalId":126939,"journal":{"name":"International Studies on Sparrows","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies on Sparrows","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/isspar-2015-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Humans are probably the only species which obtain satisfaction from helping other species, including the feeding of animals. Since the end of the XIX century it has been proposed to feed birds, but only in the recent decades – due to the massive growth of urban populations with an accompanying increase of the urban areas and the synanthropisation and urbanisation of many animal species – bird feeding became more common and can be conducted throughout the year. In supplemental feeding of birds we can distinguish between targeted actions and involuntary actions. Among ornithologists two extreme attitudes are apparent: The suggestion to completely abandon feeding and stop providing nest boxes on the one hand, and the strong propagation of both supplementary feeding and putting up nest boxes to enrich the composition and abundance of birds on the other hand (Berthold and Mohr 2008). The results of several studies indicate that supplemental feeding of birds must follow specified rules (Berthold and Mohr 2008, Graszka-Petrykowski 2008, Szokalski and Wojtatowicz 1989). This view has been commonly accepted now. In cities species inhabiting the built-up and green areas as well as water birds are usually fed (Berthold and Mohr 2008). Despite the fact that the problem of feeding birds has been studied often an in depth in Western Europe and North America, in Poland there are no publications on this topic so far. Supplemental feeding of birds has also biological consequences, increasing survival and breeding success in the next season (Doerr and Silvy 2002, Robb et al. 2008).
人类可能是唯一能从帮助其他物种(包括喂养动物)中获得满足感的物种。自19世纪末以来,就有人提出喂鸟,但只是在最近几十年,由于城市人口的大规模增长,城市面积的增加以及许多动物物种的同步和城市化,喂鸟变得更加普遍,可以全年进行。在鸟类的补充喂养中,我们可以区分有针对性的行为和非自愿的行为。在鸟类学家中,有两种极端的态度是显而易见的:一方面是建议完全放弃喂养和停止提供巢箱,另一方面是大力宣传补充喂养和设置巢箱以丰富鸟类的组成和丰度(Berthold and Mohr 2008)。一些研究结果表明,鸟类的补充喂养必须遵循特定的规则(Berthold and Mohr 2008; Graszka-Petrykowski 2008; Szokalski and Wojtatowicz 1989)。这一观点现在已被普遍接受。在城市中,通常喂养居住在建成区和绿地上的物种以及水鸟(Berthold and Mohr 2008)。尽管在西欧和北美,喂养鸟类的问题经常得到深入的研究,但在波兰,迄今为止还没有关于这一主题的出版物。鸟类的补充喂养也具有生物学后果,可以提高下一季的存活率和繁殖成功率(Doerr and Silvy 2002, Robb et al. 2008)。