A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States

Shawn M. Powers, W. Youmans
{"title":"A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States","authors":"Shawn M. Powers, W. Youmans","doi":"10.16997/jdd.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In failed or failing states, deliberation as it is operationalized in much of the political communication literature is inapplicable. These states lack advanced communication infrastructures, press systems and public spheres, which require high literacy rates, education, the rule of law and other elements of an enabling regulatory environment. Rather than imagining deliberation as a series of exchanges over focused issues, a scaled down standard of deliberation is appropriate. Such a model could simply involve enhanced communication and information sharing among the citizenry, spreading political norms that aid some level of quasi-governance or simply improving the quality of life in challenging circumstances. Even in both starkly repressive countries and states where governments barely exist, some new communication technologies are increasingly available and they facilitate deliberative exchange. At the same time, foreign international broadcasters are complementing their traditional broadcasting with the development and promotion of deliberation technologies. This paper suggests international broadcasting agencies can find new purpose by utilizing emerging ICTs for the purpose of deliberative development in failed and failing states where public deliberation is under-developed.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Deliberation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In failed or failing states, deliberation as it is operationalized in much of the political communication literature is inapplicable. These states lack advanced communication infrastructures, press systems and public spheres, which require high literacy rates, education, the rule of law and other elements of an enabling regulatory environment. Rather than imagining deliberation as a series of exchanges over focused issues, a scaled down standard of deliberation is appropriate. Such a model could simply involve enhanced communication and information sharing among the citizenry, spreading political norms that aid some level of quasi-governance or simply improving the quality of life in challenging circumstances. Even in both starkly repressive countries and states where governments barely exist, some new communication technologies are increasingly available and they facilitate deliberative exchange. At the same time, foreign international broadcasters are complementing their traditional broadcasting with the development and promotion of deliberation technologies. This paper suggests international broadcasting agencies can find new purpose by utilizing emerging ICTs for the purpose of deliberative development in failed and failing states where public deliberation is under-developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际广播的新目的:资助非转型国家的审议技术
在失败或失败的国家,审议在许多政治传播文献中是不适用的。这些国家缺乏先进的通信基础设施、新闻系统和公共领域,而这些都需要高识字率、教育、法治和其他有利监管环境的要素。与其把审议想象成围绕焦点问题的一系列交流,不如降低审议的标准。这样一种模式可能只涉及加强公民之间的沟通和信息共享,传播有助于某种程度的准治理的政治规范,或者仅仅是在具有挑战性的环境中提高生活质量。即使在专制国家和政府几乎不存在的国家,一些新的通信技术也越来越容易获得,它们促进了审慎的交流。与此同时,国外的国际广播机构正在以审议技术的发展和推广来补充其传统广播。本文建议,国际广播机构可以通过利用新兴的信息通信技术,在公共审议不发达的失败和即将失败的国家实现审议发展的目的,找到新的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How and Why Deliberative Democracy Enables Co-Intelligence and Brings Wisdom to Governance Equality and Equity in Deliberation: Introduction to the Special Issue Outsourcing Participatory Democracy: Critical Reflections on the Participatory Budgeting Experiences in Taiwan Review of Scientists, Experts, and Civic Engagement: Walking a Fine Line edited by Amy E. Lesen (Farnham: Ashgate, 2015) A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1