Errors and Mistakes in the Norwegian Child Protection System

Marit Skivenes, Ø. Tefre
{"title":"Errors and Mistakes in the Norwegian Child Protection System","authors":"Marit Skivenes, Ø. Tefre","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvz0h8bh.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this chapter is to examine the Norwegian approach to review and revise errors in the child protection system. Through the last three decades of public discourse, children in Norway have increasingly become identified as independent subjects, and in September 2017, the Norwegian government introduced legislation that gave children the legal right to protection through an amendment of the existing Child Welfare Act of 1992 (Prop. 169 L (2016–2017). Despite being ranked highly in international comparisons, the Norwegian child protection system is harshly criticized. In recent years (2015 and 2016), outrages have been highlighted through both social and traditional media, and internationally. The Norwegian term for child protection – barnevernet has become a synonym for a draconian system that steals children from their parents. The uproar and the critique came from citizens and civil society organizations, various public agencies, private persons and organizations. Auditing and oversight agencies are used to scrutinize the practices, and to follow up on errors and mistakes but there is little research on how this oversight operates, how agencies and local authorities respond to feedback, and how the day-to-day practices on correcting errors and improving practice are attended to in agencies and organizations. Based on policy documents, audit and oversight reports, legislation and key informant interviews, this chapter examines the overarching Norwegian approach to review and revise errors and mistakes through audit and oversight bodies, and discusses the strengths and weaknesses with this approach.","PeriodicalId":147277,"journal":{"name":"Errors and Mistakes in Child Protection","volume":"55 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Errors and Mistakes in Child Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvz0h8bh.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to examine the Norwegian approach to review and revise errors in the child protection system. Through the last three decades of public discourse, children in Norway have increasingly become identified as independent subjects, and in September 2017, the Norwegian government introduced legislation that gave children the legal right to protection through an amendment of the existing Child Welfare Act of 1992 (Prop. 169 L (2016–2017). Despite being ranked highly in international comparisons, the Norwegian child protection system is harshly criticized. In recent years (2015 and 2016), outrages have been highlighted through both social and traditional media, and internationally. The Norwegian term for child protection – barnevernet has become a synonym for a draconian system that steals children from their parents. The uproar and the critique came from citizens and civil society organizations, various public agencies, private persons and organizations. Auditing and oversight agencies are used to scrutinize the practices, and to follow up on errors and mistakes but there is little research on how this oversight operates, how agencies and local authorities respond to feedback, and how the day-to-day practices on correcting errors and improving practice are attended to in agencies and organizations. Based on policy documents, audit and oversight reports, legislation and key informant interviews, this chapter examines the overarching Norwegian approach to review and revise errors and mistakes through audit and oversight bodies, and discusses the strengths and weaknesses with this approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威儿童保护制度中的错误和错误
本章的目的是审查挪威审查和修正儿童保护制度错误的方法。在过去三十年的公共话语中,挪威的儿童越来越被视为独立的主体,2017年9月,挪威政府通过修订现有的1992年《儿童福利法》(Prop. 169 L(2016-2017)),引入了立法,赋予儿童合法的保护权利。尽管在国际比较中排名很高,但挪威的儿童保护制度受到了严厉的批评。近年来(2015年和2016年),社会和传统媒体以及国际上都强调了暴行。挪威语中“保护儿童”的意思是“barnevernet”,现在已经变成了把孩子从父母身边偷走的严酷制度的代名词。喧嚣和批评来自公民和民间社会组织、各种公共机构、个人和组织。审计和监督机构被用来审查这些做法,并跟踪错误和错误,但很少研究这种监督如何运作,机构和地方当局如何回应反馈,以及如何在机构和组织中进行纠正错误和改进做法的日常实践。本章根据政策文件、审计和监督报告、立法和主要举报人访谈,审查了挪威通过审计和监督机构审查和修正错误和错误的总体方法,并讨论了这种方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Construction of Child Abuse in Ireland: Public Discourse, Policy Challenges and Practice Failures List of figures and tables Errors and Mistakes in Child Protection in Switzerland: A Missed Opportunity of Reflection? England: Errors and Mistakes in Child Protection: An Unspoken Issue in Italy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1