Climato-scepticisme in France

Stephanie Posthumus
{"title":"Climato-scepticisme in France","authors":"Stephanie Posthumus","doi":"10.5040/9781350057050.CH-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"judgement of decision about whether Anaxagoras and Galileo and Lysenko are or right […] The external history has the sciences join or develop into schools or pressure groups, and it demands that their truth be socially canonized. Individuals or associations appear before a given court, and fragile truth is thereby reinforced […]. In the final analysis, there is no general history of science that is not judicially recorded. No science without trials; no truth without judgements, whether internal or external to knowledge. Its history can’t do without tribunals.","PeriodicalId":192798,"journal":{"name":"Climate Change Scepticism","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Change Scepticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350057050.CH-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

judgement of decision about whether Anaxagoras and Galileo and Lysenko are or right […] The external history has the sciences join or develop into schools or pressure groups, and it demands that their truth be socially canonized. Individuals or associations appear before a given court, and fragile truth is thereby reinforced […]. In the final analysis, there is no general history of science that is not judicially recorded. No science without trials; no truth without judgements, whether internal or external to knowledge. Its history can’t do without tribunals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国的气候怀疑论者
判断阿那萨哥拉、伽利略和李森科是否正确[…]外部历史让科学加入或发展成学派或压力团体,并要求他们的真理被社会推崇。个人或团体出现在特定的法庭上,脆弱的事实因此得到加强[…]。在最后的分析中,没有科学的通史是没有公正记录的。没有未经试验的科学;没有判断就没有真理,无论是内部的还是外部的知识。它的历史离不开法庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Scepticism and Christian Conservatism in the United States Science and Technology Studies, Ecocriticism and Climate Change Climate Scepticism in the UK Climato-scepticisme in France Klimaskepsis in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1