Arguedas: Capital y conversión

Karen Benezra, John T. Cull, Daniela Flesler, Gustavo Herrera Díaz, Rocío Ortuño Casanova, E. Fernández, Denise Kripper, Tom McEnaney, A. Merino, Gonzalo Montero, Katharine Murphy, Élika Ortega, R. Quispe-Agnoli, J. Slater, Irina Troconis, Sonia Zarco-Real
{"title":"Arguedas: Capital y conversión","authors":"Karen Benezra, John T. Cull, Daniela Flesler, Gustavo Herrera Díaz, Rocío Ortuño Casanova, E. Fernández, Denise Kripper, Tom McEnaney, A. Merino, Gonzalo Montero, Katharine Murphy, Élika Ortega, R. Quispe-Agnoli, J. Slater, Irina Troconis, Sonia Zarco-Real","doi":"10.1353/rvs.2021.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In José María Arguedas's anthropological studies of Peru's southern central highlands, transculturation codes the historical logic of capital. The present essay takes, as its point of departure, Latin American subalternist critics who, in the 1990s and 2000s, identified the supposedly homogenizing logic of capital with that of transculturation or mestizaje as state ideology. By contrast, more recent interventions in postcolonial and Marxist theory suggest that what was at stake for Andean society and culture was not its wholesale destruction or incorporation into the nation-state, but rather the expedience of its preservation for the accumulation of capital. Arguedas's treatment of transculturation as a question of the so-called total conversion of the subject of highland property into a bourgeois individual mirrors the kind of anthropological transformation that Marx posited as part of the historical arc of capitalism's development and supposedly imminent demise. By underscoring the moment of total conversion as a semblance necessary for capturing non-capitalist ways of life, Arguedas's studies provide a space for considering the subjective effects of capital beyond teleological or reductive understandings of its historical unfolding.","PeriodicalId":281386,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Hispánicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Hispánicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rvs.2021.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In José María Arguedas's anthropological studies of Peru's southern central highlands, transculturation codes the historical logic of capital. The present essay takes, as its point of departure, Latin American subalternist critics who, in the 1990s and 2000s, identified the supposedly homogenizing logic of capital with that of transculturation or mestizaje as state ideology. By contrast, more recent interventions in postcolonial and Marxist theory suggest that what was at stake for Andean society and culture was not its wholesale destruction or incorporation into the nation-state, but rather the expedience of its preservation for the accumulation of capital. Arguedas's treatment of transculturation as a question of the so-called total conversion of the subject of highland property into a bourgeois individual mirrors the kind of anthropological transformation that Marx posited as part of the historical arc of capitalism's development and supposedly imminent demise. By underscoring the moment of total conversion as a semblance necessary for capturing non-capitalist ways of life, Arguedas's studies provide a space for considering the subjective effects of capital beyond teleological or reductive understandings of its historical unfolding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arguedas:资本和转换
摘要:在jos María Arguedas对秘鲁南部中部高地的人类学研究中,跨文化(transculation)编码了资本的历史逻辑。本文以拉丁美洲次替代主义批评家为出发点,他们在20世纪90年代和21世纪初将资本的所谓同质化逻辑与跨文化或梅斯蒂萨伊作为国家意识形态的逻辑等同起来。相比之下,最近对后殖民主义和马克思主义理论的干预表明,安第斯社会和文化的利害关系不是它的大规模破坏或融入民族国家,而是它为资本积累而保存的权宜之计。阿格达斯对跨文化的处理是所谓的高地财产主体向资产阶级个体的完全转换的问题,这反映了马克思所假定的作为资本主义发展和即将灭亡的历史轨迹的一部分的人类学转变。阿格达斯的研究强调了完全转换的时刻是捕捉非资本主义生活方式所必需的外表,为考虑资本的主观影响提供了一个空间,超越了对其历史展开的目的论或简化的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Melancholy Void: Lyric and Masculinity in the Age of Góngora by Felipe Valencia (review) Structures Do March in the Streets: De Certeauian Tactics in Jorge Volpi's "Tetralogy of Power" La Hermosa Carne: el cuerpo en la poesía puertorriqueña actual by Juan Pablo Rivera (review) Reality TV, Poverty Porn, and the "Money Shot": Performing Female Incarceration in Los caballeros las prefieren presas by Minerva Valenzuela The Secret to Catalan Political Identity in Ventura Pons's Barcelona (un mapa)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1