A preliminary techno-economic comparison between a grid-connected and non-grid connected offshore floating wind farm

A. Ioannou, F. Brennan
{"title":"A preliminary techno-economic comparison between a grid-connected and non-grid connected offshore floating wind farm","authors":"A. Ioannou, F. Brennan","doi":"10.1109/OSES.2019.8867350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-grid connected (NGC) floating offshore wind (OW) turbines can signify a solution for harvesting wind energy far offshore, addressing some key issues including the deep waters and lack of grid connection, while also exploiting the higher capacity factors. Towards this direction, on-board energy storage in the form of hydrogen production is one of the most promising solutions, often cited in literature. This study aims to perform a preliminary techno-economic analysis to assess the trade-offs, in terms of cost, between a far offshore grid-connected (GC) floating wind farm and a NGC wind farm integrated with an electrolyser for the production of hydrogen. To this end, a lifecycle techno-economic model coupled with an O&M model developed for offshore wind installations are employed. The model is applied to a hypothetical wind farm located 200km from the shore. For the GC system, O&M costs along with the costs of acquisition of the electric system (offshore cable and offshore substation) appeared to be the main contributors to the Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE). As far as the NGC system is concerned, it was concluded that a higher annual capacity factor (>60%) could potentially achieve viability of the investment.","PeriodicalId":416860,"journal":{"name":"2019 Offshore Energy and Storage Summit (OSES)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Offshore Energy and Storage Summit (OSES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OSES.2019.8867350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Non-grid connected (NGC) floating offshore wind (OW) turbines can signify a solution for harvesting wind energy far offshore, addressing some key issues including the deep waters and lack of grid connection, while also exploiting the higher capacity factors. Towards this direction, on-board energy storage in the form of hydrogen production is one of the most promising solutions, often cited in literature. This study aims to perform a preliminary techno-economic analysis to assess the trade-offs, in terms of cost, between a far offshore grid-connected (GC) floating wind farm and a NGC wind farm integrated with an electrolyser for the production of hydrogen. To this end, a lifecycle techno-economic model coupled with an O&M model developed for offshore wind installations are employed. The model is applied to a hypothetical wind farm located 200km from the shore. For the GC system, O&M costs along with the costs of acquisition of the electric system (offshore cable and offshore substation) appeared to be the main contributors to the Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE). As far as the NGC system is concerned, it was concluded that a higher annual capacity factor (>60%) could potentially achieve viability of the investment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并网与非并网海上浮式风电场的初步技术经济比较
无电网连接(NGC)浮动海上风电(OW)涡轮机可以提供一种远距离收集风能的解决方案,解决了一些关键问题,包括深水和缺乏电网连接,同时还利用了更高的容量因素。在这个方向上,以制氢形式的车载储能是最有前途的解决方案之一,经常被文献引用。本研究的目的是进行初步的技术经济分析,以评估在成本方面,远海上并网(GC)浮动风力发电场和与电解槽集成的NGC风力发电场之间的权衡。为此,采用了为海上风电设施开发的生命周期技术经济模型和运维模型。该模型应用于距离海岸200公里的一个假设的风力发电场。对于GC系统,运维成本以及电力系统(海上电缆和海上变电站)的购置成本似乎是电力平定成本(LCOE)的主要贡献者。就NGC系统而言,较高的年容量因子(>60%)可能实现投资的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the regional potential for emissions reduction using energy storage A comparative study of the Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES) and Pumped Thermal Energy Storage (PTES) systems Modelling the effects of low-cost large-scale energy storage in the UK electricity network Present Status and Challenges for the Interaction between Offshore Wind Farms and Maritime Navigation in the Taiwan Strait Modeling of Multiterminal HVDC Offshore Grids with Renewable Energy and Storage Integration by Opensource Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1