12. ‘Houses of the dead’? Columnar sarcophagi as ‘micro-architecture’

Edmund Thomas
{"title":"12. ‘Houses of the dead’? Columnar sarcophagi as ‘micro-architecture’","authors":"Edmund Thomas","doi":"10.1515/9783110216783.387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of the twentieth century architects across the world sought to bring architecture closer to humanity. ‘Micro-architecture’ in the form of shelters, street furniture, and inhabitable sculptures, designed as places of retreat or isolation, stimulated creative design. Simultaneously, medieval art historians considered how a ‘micro-architecture’ of religious ornaments and furnishings, reproducing small buildings in miniature, had enabled individual viewers to identify more deeply with heavenly ideals. Small-scale, sacred architectural forms – reliquaries, censers, screens, stalls, pulpits, fonts and baldachins – triggered emotional responses and offered spiritual refuge. As FranÅois Bucher claimed, a quarter of a century earlier, these ‘fluidly superimposed systems of decoration’, combining ‘formal bravado with theological complexity in a small space’ and offering ‘dazzling structural dexterity’ and geometric complexity, were exemplars of Gothic style that sheltered the mysteries of Christianity. Based on an aesthetic vocabulary taken from monumental archetypes, they acquired, through the innovative designs of architects seeking new fields for experimentation, sophisticated forms transcending those larger structures and became almost the raison d’Þtre of the buildings housing them. Modern and medieval manifestations of micro-architecture differ in scale, but both make statements about relationships between ideal and real space, between body and soul, between different genres of architecture, and between architecture and the human body. Classical antiquity knew ample instances of such ‘micro-architecture’, but their religious or philosophical significance has yet to receive similar investigation. Studies, for example, of the small ash urn from Chiusi (Figure 12.1) have focused instead on its potential as a literal representation of an Etruscan house and its use to historians as evidence for larger structures. Yet,","PeriodicalId":340893,"journal":{"name":"Life, Death and Representation","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life, Death and Representation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216783.387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

At the end of the twentieth century architects across the world sought to bring architecture closer to humanity. ‘Micro-architecture’ in the form of shelters, street furniture, and inhabitable sculptures, designed as places of retreat or isolation, stimulated creative design. Simultaneously, medieval art historians considered how a ‘micro-architecture’ of religious ornaments and furnishings, reproducing small buildings in miniature, had enabled individual viewers to identify more deeply with heavenly ideals. Small-scale, sacred architectural forms – reliquaries, censers, screens, stalls, pulpits, fonts and baldachins – triggered emotional responses and offered spiritual refuge. As FranÅois Bucher claimed, a quarter of a century earlier, these ‘fluidly superimposed systems of decoration’, combining ‘formal bravado with theological complexity in a small space’ and offering ‘dazzling structural dexterity’ and geometric complexity, were exemplars of Gothic style that sheltered the mysteries of Christianity. Based on an aesthetic vocabulary taken from monumental archetypes, they acquired, through the innovative designs of architects seeking new fields for experimentation, sophisticated forms transcending those larger structures and became almost the raison d’Þtre of the buildings housing them. Modern and medieval manifestations of micro-architecture differ in scale, but both make statements about relationships between ideal and real space, between body and soul, between different genres of architecture, and between architecture and the human body. Classical antiquity knew ample instances of such ‘micro-architecture’, but their religious or philosophical significance has yet to receive similar investigation. Studies, for example, of the small ash urn from Chiusi (Figure 12.1) have focused instead on its potential as a literal representation of an Etruscan house and its use to historians as evidence for larger structures. Yet,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
12. “死人的房子”?柱状石棺是“微建筑”
20世纪末,世界各地的建筑师都在努力使建筑更贴近人类。以庇护所、街道家具和可居住雕塑为形式的“微建筑”,被设计为隐居或隔离的地方,激发了创造性的设计。与此同时,中世纪的艺术史学家认为,一种由宗教装饰品和家具组成的“微型建筑”是如何以微缩的形式再现小型建筑的,从而使个人观众更深刻地认同天堂的理想。小型的、神圣的建筑形式——圣物箱、香炉、屏风、摊位、讲坛、字体和baldachins——引发了情感反应,并提供了精神庇护。正如FranÅois Bucher所说,在25年前,这些“流畅的装饰叠加系统”,结合了“在小空间里的形式虚张声势和神学复杂性”,提供了“令人眼花缭乱的结构灵巧性”和几何复杂性,是哥特式风格的典范,掩盖了基督教的神秘。基于从纪念性原型中获得的美学词汇,通过建筑师寻求新的实验领域的创新设计,他们获得了超越那些大型结构的复杂形式,几乎成为了建造这些建筑Þtre的理由。现代和中世纪微建筑的表现形式在规模上有所不同,但都表达了理想与现实空间、身体与灵魂、不同建筑类型以及建筑与人体之间的关系。古代有很多这样的“微建筑”的例子,但它们的宗教或哲学意义还没有得到类似的研究。例如,对来自Chiusi的小灰缸的研究(图12.1)则侧重于它作为伊特鲁里亚房屋的字面代表的潜力,以及它对历史学家的使用,作为更大建筑的证据。然而,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
6. In the Guise of Gods and Heroes: Portrait Heads on Roman Mythological Sarcophagi 3. Tragedy’s Forgotten Beauty: the Medieval Return of Orestes 4. The Roman Sarcophagus ‘Industry’: a Reconsideration 2. Habent sua fata: Writing life histories of Roman Sarcophagi 1. Before Sarcophagi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1