Effect of Teaching Methods on "Higher Order Thinking Skills" of Elementary Level Science Students

Zubaida Khanam, Ahmad Sher Awan
{"title":"Effect of Teaching Methods on \"Higher Order Thinking Skills\" of Elementary Level Science Students","authors":"Zubaida Khanam, Ahmad Sher Awan","doi":"10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of two different teaching methods on “Higher Order Thinking Skills” (HOTS) of elementary-level science learners was analyzed in this research. This is an emerging field in research globally as well as in the Pakistani scenario. The research design used for this project was a \"pre-test and post-test control group design”. Two sections comprising 40 students were selected randomly and were taught with two different teaching methods; the \"experimental group\" engaged by \"Problem Based Learning Method\" (PBLM) while the “control group” dealt with the \"Traditional Method\" (TM). The academic performance of the students was evaluated through an Achievement Test of Science (ATS).Post analysis data study showed that the performance of the “experimental group” engaged by the“problem-based learning method” was better on “higher order thinking skills” at elementary level science.The study findings may be helpful for science teachers, teachers training institutions, and other educational stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":129253,"journal":{"name":"Global Educational Studies Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Educational Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of two different teaching methods on “Higher Order Thinking Skills” (HOTS) of elementary-level science learners was analyzed in this research. This is an emerging field in research globally as well as in the Pakistani scenario. The research design used for this project was a "pre-test and post-test control group design”. Two sections comprising 40 students were selected randomly and were taught with two different teaching methods; the "experimental group" engaged by "Problem Based Learning Method" (PBLM) while the “control group” dealt with the "Traditional Method" (TM). The academic performance of the students was evaluated through an Achievement Test of Science (ATS).Post analysis data study showed that the performance of the “experimental group” engaged by the“problem-based learning method” was better on “higher order thinking skills” at elementary level science.The study findings may be helpful for science teachers, teachers training institutions, and other educational stakeholders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学方法对小学理科学生“高阶思维技能”的影响
本研究分析了两种不同的教学方法对初级科学学习者“高阶思维技能”的影响。这在全球和巴基斯坦的研究中都是一个新兴领域。本课题采用的研究设计为“前测后测对照组设计”。随机抽取两组40名学生,采用两种不同的教学方法进行教学;“实验组”使用“基于问题的学习方法”(PBLM),而“对照组”使用“传统方法”(TM)。学生们的学业成绩是通过科学成就测试(ATS)来评估的。后分析数据研究表明,采用“问题导向型学习方法”的“实验组”在基础科学的“高阶思维技能”上表现更好。研究结果可能对科学教师、教师培训机构和其他教育利益相关者有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Role of Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership: A Study of School Principals from Urban Politeness in the Classrooms of the Visually Impaired Students: A Case Study Effect of Higher Education in Fostering Civic Values among University Students Exploring the Entrepreneurial Intention, Expectations of Success and Self-efficacy among the Students of Physical Education and Sports Sciences in Pakistan Effect of Supervision on Teachers' Performance at the Secondary Level in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1