Exclusive nature of the European, Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration and tension in the European post-Soviet space

M. Kostic
{"title":"Exclusive nature of the European, Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration and tension in the European post-Soviet space","authors":"M. Kostic","doi":"10.2298/medjp1904498k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this paper is to determine the relations between the European,\n Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration, especially their exclusive character\n and the turmoil in the European post-Soviet space. The paper concludes that\n the exclusive nature of the integration process, which has a value and a\n geopolitical dimension, encourages the USA, EU and Russia conflicts for\n control over this area and leads to the reopening of ethnic and territorial\n disputes (solutions for one represent deepening of crisis for the other\n stakeholders), remilitarization and a new arms race, the increased military\n presence of the USA and Russia in the region and further destabilization of\n the world and European order, especially the relationship between the\n USA-Russia-EU. The roots of these integrations are found at the end of the\n Cold War, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and the survival of Western\n economic and defence organizations that sought and still seek to expand to\n the post-Soviet space in order to create a universal liberal democratic world\n order despite Russian dissent. This work thus sheds light on the\n contradictions of keeping an open-door policy of the European and\n Euro-Atlantic integration, which causes the opposite effect in Russia - a\n sense of closing the door, the new isolation and restraint, creating new\n divisions in Europe. On the other hand, the contradiction that this analysis\n reveals is that Russia, while seeking equal treatment and respect for its\n interests by the West, is in fact expecting respect of its inequality\n compared to other European post-Soviet republics, de facto recognition of its\n right of veto to the post-Soviet republics integration and its special role\n in this region, which practically bolster further fears that these countries\n will be returned to the Russian sphere of influence or even a new Russian\n state. Of the several variables that have remained as a result of the breakup\n of the Soviet Union and affected the foreign policies of the post-Soviet\n states, the question of the type of integration became crucial because of its\n defence, geopolitical, economic and wider social effects.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp1904498k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this paper is to determine the relations between the European, Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration, especially their exclusive character and the turmoil in the European post-Soviet space. The paper concludes that the exclusive nature of the integration process, which has a value and a geopolitical dimension, encourages the USA, EU and Russia conflicts for control over this area and leads to the reopening of ethnic and territorial disputes (solutions for one represent deepening of crisis for the other stakeholders), remilitarization and a new arms race, the increased military presence of the USA and Russia in the region and further destabilization of the world and European order, especially the relationship between the USA-Russia-EU. The roots of these integrations are found at the end of the Cold War, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and the survival of Western economic and defence organizations that sought and still seek to expand to the post-Soviet space in order to create a universal liberal democratic world order despite Russian dissent. This work thus sheds light on the contradictions of keeping an open-door policy of the European and Euro-Atlantic integration, which causes the opposite effect in Russia - a sense of closing the door, the new isolation and restraint, creating new divisions in Europe. On the other hand, the contradiction that this analysis reveals is that Russia, while seeking equal treatment and respect for its interests by the West, is in fact expecting respect of its inequality compared to other European post-Soviet republics, de facto recognition of its right of veto to the post-Soviet republics integration and its special role in this region, which practically bolster further fears that these countries will be returned to the Russian sphere of influence or even a new Russian state. Of the several variables that have remained as a result of the breakup of the Soviet Union and affected the foreign policies of the post-Soviet states, the question of the type of integration became crucial because of its defence, geopolitical, economic and wider social effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲的排他性、欧洲-大西洋和欧亚一体化与欧洲后苏联空间的紧张关系
本文的主题是确定欧洲、欧洲-大西洋和欧亚一体化之间的关系,特别是它们的排他性与欧洲后苏联空间的动荡。本文得出结论:一体化进程的排外性,一个值和一个地缘政治维度,鼓励美国、欧盟和俄罗斯冲突控制这个区域,导致民族和领土争端的重新开放(解决方案一个代表深化危机的其他利益相关者),重整军备和新的军备竞赛,增加美国和俄罗斯在该地区的军事存在和进一步的不稳定的世界和欧洲的订单,尤其是美俄欧关系。这些一体化的根源可以追溯到冷战结束时,苏联解体,西方经济和国防组织的生存,这些组织寻求并仍在寻求扩展到后苏联空间,以创建一个普遍的自由民主世界秩序,尽管俄罗斯持不同意见。因此,这项工作揭示了保持欧洲和欧洲-大西洋一体化的门户开放政策的矛盾,这在俄罗斯造成了相反的效果——一种关上大门的感觉,新的孤立和限制,在欧洲造成新的分裂。另一方面,这一分析揭示的矛盾是,俄罗斯在寻求西方对其利益的平等对待和尊重的同时,实际上希望西方尊重其与其他欧洲后苏联共和国相比的不平等,事实上承认其对后苏联共和国一体化的否决权及其在该地区的特殊作用。这实际上加剧了人们的担忧,即这些国家将重新回到俄罗斯的势力范围,甚至成为一个新的俄罗斯国家。在由于苏联解体而遗留下来并影响到后苏联国家外交政策的几个变数中,一体化类型的问题由于其国防、地缘政治、经济和更广泛的社会影响而变得至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The roots of the idea of humanitarian intervention in De Iure Belli ac Pacis by Hugo Grotius The prospects of U.S.-Russian relations in the light of war in Ukraine: “Containment 2.0.” The sword of Damocles in global stability China’s 21st century geopolitics and geo-economics: An evidence from the Western Balkans The crisis of democracy in Eastern Europe: (un)successful political integration of new members?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1