What Is a “Known and Established” Standard?

Samuel Miranda
{"title":"What Is a “Known and Established” Standard?","authors":"Samuel Miranda","doi":"10.1115/ICONE26-81901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The NRC staff, and licensees will sometimes cite a Known and Established Standard, especially when there is evidence that the staff’s position, with respect to a Known and Established Standard, may have changed. Licensees will often flag such changes as backfits, and demand that they meet the requirements of the Backfit Rule in the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR §50.109). However, the term, Known and Established Standard, is not clearly defined. If the term is not defined by the NRC staff, then it’s possible that it will be defined by others, most notably by licensees with technical issues or license amendment requests (LARs) that are undergoing the staff’s review.\n What follows is a discussion of the origin and application of the NRC’s Known and Established Standard, and how it might be defined. The Known and Established Standard is first deconstructed into its two components, Known and Established, and then each is defined separately. When this is done, it becomes apparent that some Known and Established Standards can be more important than others. The two definitions can be used, together, to distinguish between unequal, even incompatible Known and Established Standards. This could help the NRC staff identify the most relevant Known and Established Standard to apply in its review or evaluation of a particular technical issue or license amendment request (LAR). Simply choosing the most recent of Known and Established Standards might not be adequate.","PeriodicalId":354697,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Advanced Reactors and Fusion Technologies; Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","volume":"76 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Advanced Reactors and Fusion Technologies; Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE26-81901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The NRC staff, and licensees will sometimes cite a Known and Established Standard, especially when there is evidence that the staff’s position, with respect to a Known and Established Standard, may have changed. Licensees will often flag such changes as backfits, and demand that they meet the requirements of the Backfit Rule in the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR §50.109). However, the term, Known and Established Standard, is not clearly defined. If the term is not defined by the NRC staff, then it’s possible that it will be defined by others, most notably by licensees with technical issues or license amendment requests (LARs) that are undergoing the staff’s review. What follows is a discussion of the origin and application of the NRC’s Known and Established Standard, and how it might be defined. The Known and Established Standard is first deconstructed into its two components, Known and Established, and then each is defined separately. When this is done, it becomes apparent that some Known and Established Standards can be more important than others. The two definitions can be used, together, to distinguish between unequal, even incompatible Known and Established Standards. This could help the NRC staff identify the most relevant Known and Established Standard to apply in its review or evaluation of a particular technical issue or license amendment request (LAR). Simply choosing the most recent of Known and Established Standards might not be adequate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是“已知和既定”的标准?
核管理委员会工作人员和被许可人有时会引用已知和既定标准,特别是当有证据表明工作人员对已知和既定标准的立场可能发生变化时。被许可方通常会将此类变更标记为改装,并要求其符合《联邦法规法典》(10 CFR§50.109)中改装规则的要求。然而,术语“已知和建立的标准”并没有明确的定义。如果NRC工作人员没有定义该术语,则可能由其他人定义,最明显的是有技术问题或许可证修改请求(LARs)的被许可人正在接受工作人员的审查。接下来将讨论核管理委员会的已知和既定标准的起源和应用,以及如何对其进行定义。已知和建立的标准首先被分解成两个组件,已知和建立,然后分别定义每个组件。当这样做时,很明显,一些已知和已建立的标准可能比其他标准更重要。这两个定义可以一起使用,以区分不平等,甚至不相容的已知标准和既定标准。这可以帮助NRC工作人员确定最相关的已知和既定标准,以应用于其审查或评估特定技术问题或许可修改请求(LAR)。简单地选择最新的已知和建立的标准可能是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling the Neutronics of a Molten Salt Fast Reactor Using DYN3D-MG for the Investigation of the Application of Frozen Wall Technology Conceptual Design and Neutronics/Thermal-Hydraulic Coupling Optimization Analyses of Two Typical Helium Cooled Solid Breeder Blanket Modules for CFETR Phase II The Backfit Rule’s Compliance Exception A Framework and Model for Assessing the Design Point Performance, Off-Design Point Performance, Control, Economics and Risks of Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants AFCEN RCC-F: A New Standard for the Fire Protection Design of New Built Light Water Nuclear Power Plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1