Cost of Tape versus Disk for Archival Storage

Jeff T. Inman, G. Grider, Hsing-bung Chen
{"title":"Cost of Tape versus Disk for Archival Storage","authors":"Jeff T. Inman, G. Grider, Hsing-bung Chen","doi":"10.1109/CLOUD.2014.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For archiving large datasets in high-performance computing facilities, tape technology has a long history of providing inexpensive capacity. However, as the memory-size of supercomputers continues to grow geometrically, the cost of tape bandwidth is becoming more important. The projected costs for tape-drives, robotics, and maintenance, are creating challenges for tape-based archives. The advent of erasure-coded object storage, driven by the \"cloud storage\" industry, might make it practical to implement archives using disks, or hybrid disk-and-tape systems. We used linear optimization techniques to investigate when and how this transition might best be made, taking into consideration our significant investment in tape technology. Our models introduce a technique to systematically relax constraints on the relationship between tape-capacity and tape-bandwidth, which governs a trade-off between cost and performance. We ran parameter studies that support some preliminary conclusions about paths forward for archive infrastructure at LANL.","PeriodicalId":288542,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2014.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

For archiving large datasets in high-performance computing facilities, tape technology has a long history of providing inexpensive capacity. However, as the memory-size of supercomputers continues to grow geometrically, the cost of tape bandwidth is becoming more important. The projected costs for tape-drives, robotics, and maintenance, are creating challenges for tape-based archives. The advent of erasure-coded object storage, driven by the "cloud storage" industry, might make it practical to implement archives using disks, or hybrid disk-and-tape systems. We used linear optimization techniques to investigate when and how this transition might best be made, taking into consideration our significant investment in tape technology. Our models introduce a technique to systematically relax constraints on the relationship between tape-capacity and tape-bandwidth, which governs a trade-off between cost and performance. We ran parameter studies that support some preliminary conclusions about paths forward for archive infrastructure at LANL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于归档存储的磁带与磁盘的成本
为了在高性能计算设施中归档大型数据集,磁带技术在提供廉价容量方面有着悠久的历史。然而,随着超级计算机的内存大小继续呈几何级增长,磁带带宽的成本变得越来越重要。磁带驱动器、机器人和维护的预计成本给基于磁带的归档带来了挑战。由“云存储”行业推动的擦除编码对象存储的出现,可能会使使用磁盘或磁盘和磁带混合系统实现归档变得可行。考虑到我们在胶带技术上的重大投资,我们使用线性优化技术来研究何时以及如何最好地实现这种转变。我们的模型引入了一种技术,系统地放宽了对磁带容量和磁带带宽之间关系的限制,这控制了成本和性能之间的权衡。我们进行了一些参数研究,这些研究支持一些关于LANL存档基础设施前进路径的初步结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
User-Friendly Visualization of Cloud Quality Energy and Performance-Aware Task Scheduling in a Mobile Cloud Computing Environment MediaPaaS: A Cloud-Based Media Processing Platform for Elastic Live Broadcasting AppCloak: Rapid Migration of Legacy Applications into Cloud Introducing SSDs to the Hadoop MapReduce Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1