{"title":"Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68","authors":"Jeffrey Wale","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.