Pub Date : 2019-12-12DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-014
Alice Belcher
{"title":"Commonwealth Oil & Gas Co Ltd v Baxter and Another [2009] CSIH 75","authors":"Alice Belcher","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131370137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-12DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-11.2
B. Holligan
Rafique v Amin is one of the few reported cases to address the use and management of property that is owned in common. While not an obviously gendered dispute, it nevertheless involves a number of issues fundamental to feminist theory, in particular, notions of identity and autonomy and the role of property rules in mediating between individual and collective interests. In Scots law, property owned by multiple individuals is often held as common property. This is similar to the English concept of the equitable tenancy in common, in that each owner is treated as having a distinct and separable share in an undivided whole. Debate in Rafique occurs within the context of an antipathy towards the very idea of common property that is embedded within Scots legal doctrine.
{"title":"Commentary on Rafique v Amin","authors":"B. Holligan","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-11.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-11.2","url":null,"abstract":"Rafique v Amin is one of the few reported cases to address the use and management of property that is owned in common. While not an obviously gendered dispute, it nevertheless involves a number of issues fundamental to feminist theory, in particular, notions of identity and autonomy and the role of property rules in mediating between individual and collective interests. In Scots law, property owned by multiple individuals is often held as common property. This is similar to the English concept of the equitable tenancy in common, in that each owner is treated as having a distinct and separable share in an undivided whole. Debate in Rafique occurs within the context of an antipathy towards the very idea of common property that is embedded within Scots legal doctrine.","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115294086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-12DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-008
K. Norrie
An imagined judgment delivered in the contact case of White v White, structured according to feminist principles.
在怀特诉怀特的接触案中，根据女权主义原则构建的假想判决。
{"title":"White v White 2001 SC 689","authors":"K. Norrie","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-008","url":null,"abstract":"An imagined judgment delivered in the contact case of White v White, structured according to feminist principles.","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127022480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-11-01DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-5.2
L. Campbell
{"title":"Commentary on Ruxton v Lang","authors":"L. Campbell","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-5.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-5.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126341793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-31DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-002
S. Cowan, C. Kennedy, V. Munro
{"title":"Devolving Dictum? Legal Tradition, National Identity and Feminist Activism","authors":"S. Cowan, C. Kennedy, V. Munro","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128130196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-01-20DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015
Jeffrey Wale
This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.
{"title":"Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68","authors":"Jeffrey Wale","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015","url":null,"abstract":"This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126068333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-18.2
Shazia Choudhry
{"title":"Commentary on Salvesen v Riddell","authors":"Shazia Choudhry","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-18.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-18.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125292302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-3.3
Ilona Cairns
{"title":"Reflective Statement: Smith v Lees","authors":"Ilona Cairns","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-3.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-3.3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126432809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：