The Effects of a Novel Lateral Ankle Strengthening Program in NCAA Division III Football Players

J. Buxton, CJ Otwell, Jack Petit, Holton Gwaltney, Nikolas Grabiec, Samuel Luithle, Hayden D. Gerhart, P. Prins
{"title":"The Effects of a Novel Lateral Ankle Strengthening Program in NCAA Division III Football Players","authors":"J. Buxton, CJ Otwell, Jack Petit, Holton Gwaltney, Nikolas Grabiec, Samuel Luithle, Hayden D. Gerhart, P. Prins","doi":"10.53520/rdsp2023.10564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Lateral ankle sprains (LAS) are among the most reported injuries in college athletics, typically resulting from excessive closed-kinetic chain (CKC) supination.  The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a novel CKC supination-style ankle strengthening program to a traditional ankle strengthening program on common LAS indices.   \nMethods:  Thirty NCAA Division III collegiate football players (19.9±1.0yrs., 182.2±6.9cm, 98.8±18.0kg) were randomly assigned to a novel exercise (SUP, n = 16) or traditional exercise group (TRA, n = 14). The SUP group performed dynamic bodyweight exercises with controlled ankle supination while the TRA group performed traditional ankle strengthening exercise using elastic bands and stability exercises 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Right and left ankle inversion (InvR, InvL) and eversion (EvR, EvL) strength (kg), ankle inversion range of motion (romR, romL) (deg.), and figure-8 hop test (fig8R, fig8L) (s) performance were assessed pre- and post-intervention.\nResults: Both groups showed significant improvements in all outcome measures pre- to post-test (ΔInvR: TRA 4.5±4.3kg, SUP 5.0±4.4kg; ΔIvL: TRA 4.0±3.8kg, SUP 4.8±3.6kg; ΔEvR: TRA 5.7±4.3kg, SUP 4.7±3.3kg; ΔEvL: TRA 4.7±2.9kg, SUP 4.5±2.2kg; ΔromR: TRA 4.5±2.6°, SUP 4.9±3.0°; ΔromL: TRA 4.7±4.5°, SUP 4.6±5.1°; Δfig8R: TRA -0.43±0.20s, SUP -0.37±0.31s; Δfig8L: TRA -0.40±0.22s, SUP -0.34±0.30s; p’s<0.001), with no difference between groups.\nConclusions: A bodyweight, supination style ankle training program can improve physical qualities related to LAS to a similar extent as a traditional program, and therefore, could potentially be a viable alternative strategy for reducing LAS in Division III NCAA football players.","PeriodicalId":332159,"journal":{"name":"Research Directs in Strength and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Directs in Strength and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53520/rdsp2023.10564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lateral ankle sprains (LAS) are among the most reported injuries in college athletics, typically resulting from excessive closed-kinetic chain (CKC) supination.  The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a novel CKC supination-style ankle strengthening program to a traditional ankle strengthening program on common LAS indices.    Methods:  Thirty NCAA Division III collegiate football players (19.9±1.0yrs., 182.2±6.9cm, 98.8±18.0kg) were randomly assigned to a novel exercise (SUP, n = 16) or traditional exercise group (TRA, n = 14). The SUP group performed dynamic bodyweight exercises with controlled ankle supination while the TRA group performed traditional ankle strengthening exercise using elastic bands and stability exercises 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Right and left ankle inversion (InvR, InvL) and eversion (EvR, EvL) strength (kg), ankle inversion range of motion (romR, romL) (deg.), and figure-8 hop test (fig8R, fig8L) (s) performance were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in all outcome measures pre- to post-test (ΔInvR: TRA 4.5±4.3kg, SUP 5.0±4.4kg; ΔIvL: TRA 4.0±3.8kg, SUP 4.8±3.6kg; ΔEvR: TRA 5.7±4.3kg, SUP 4.7±3.3kg; ΔEvL: TRA 4.7±2.9kg, SUP 4.5±2.2kg; ΔromR: TRA 4.5±2.6°, SUP 4.9±3.0°; ΔromL: TRA 4.7±4.5°, SUP 4.6±5.1°; Δfig8R: TRA -0.43±0.20s, SUP -0.37±0.31s; Δfig8L: TRA -0.40±0.22s, SUP -0.34±0.30s; p’s<0.001), with no difference between groups. Conclusions: A bodyweight, supination style ankle training program can improve physical qualities related to LAS to a similar extent as a traditional program, and therefore, could potentially be a viable alternative strategy for reducing LAS in Division III NCAA football players.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新颖的踝关节外侧强化方案对NCAA三级橄榄球运动员的影响
简介:外侧踝关节扭伤(LAS)是大学体育运动中报道最多的损伤之一,通常是由于过度的闭合动力学链(CKC)旋后引起的。本研究的目的是比较新型CKC旋后式踝关节强化方案与传统踝关节强化方案对常见LAS指数的影响。方法:30名NCAA三级联赛大学生橄榄球运动员(19.9±1.0岁)。身高(182.2±6.9cm, 98.8±18.0kg),随机分为新运动组(SUP, n = 16)和传统运动组(TRA, n = 14)。SUP组进行动态体重训练,控制踝关节旋后,TRA组进行传统的踝关节强化训练,使用松紧带和稳定性训练,每周3次,持续6周。评估干预前后左右踝关节内翻(InvR, InvL)和外翻(EvR, EvL)力量(kg)、踝关节内翻运动范围(romR, romL)(度)和8字形跳跃试验(fig8R, fig8L)的表现。结果:两组在测试前后的所有结局指标均有显著改善(ΔInvR: TRA 4.5±4.3kg, SUP 5.0±4.4kg;ΔIvL: TRA 4.0±3.8kg, SUP 4.8±3.6kg;ΔEvR: TRA 5.7±4.3kg, SUP 4.7±3.3kg;ΔEvL: TRA 4.7±2.9kg, SUP 4.5±2.2kg;ΔromR: TRA 4.5±2.6°,SUP 4.9±3.0°;ΔromL: TRA 4.7±4.5°,SUP 4.6±5.1°;Δfig8R: TRA -0.43±0.20s, SUP -0.37±0.31s;Δfig8L: TRA -0.40±0.22s, SUP -0.34±0.30s;P <0.001),组间无差异。结论:体重、旋后式踝关节训练计划可以改善与LAS相关的身体素质,其程度与传统计划相似,因此,可能是减少NCAA三级橄榄球运动员LAS的可行替代策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of a Supervised and Unsupervised Strength and Conditioning Program for Elite Adolescent Freestyle Swimmers A Pilot Study of the Effects of Collagen vs. Whey Protein Supplementation on Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness in Healthy Individuals Nutritional Practices Among Professional Indoor and Beach Volleyball Players: A Brief Narrative Review Validity of B-Mode Ultrasound for Body Composition Assessment in the Field In Deep Water: A Case Study on Kinematics in Deep Water Running
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1