Predicting demand in a bottled water supply chain using classical time series forecasting models

Ovundah K. Wofuru-Nyenke
{"title":"Predicting demand in a bottled water supply chain using classical time series forecasting models","authors":"Ovundah K. Wofuru-Nyenke","doi":"10.5267/j.jfs.2022.9.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, various classical time series forecasting methods were compared to determine the forecasting method with the highest accuracy in predicting demand of the 50cl product of a bottled water supply chain. The classical time series forecasting methods compared are the moving average, weighted moving average, exponential smoothing, adjusted exponential smoothing, linear trend line, Holt’s model, and Winter’s model. These methods were evaluated to determine the method with the least Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) value and hence the highest forecasting accuracy. From the results, the weighted moving average forecasting method had the lowest MAD value of 1,987, making it the forecasting method with the highest accuracy for predicting the 50cl bottled water demand. While the exponential smoothing forecasting method had the highest MAD value of 2,483, making it the forecasting method with the least accuracy for predicting the 50cl bottled water demand. This research provides a procedure for aiding supply chain analysts in implementing demand forecasting using classical time series forecasting models.","PeriodicalId":150615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Future Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Future Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jfs.2022.9.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, various classical time series forecasting methods were compared to determine the forecasting method with the highest accuracy in predicting demand of the 50cl product of a bottled water supply chain. The classical time series forecasting methods compared are the moving average, weighted moving average, exponential smoothing, adjusted exponential smoothing, linear trend line, Holt’s model, and Winter’s model. These methods were evaluated to determine the method with the least Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) value and hence the highest forecasting accuracy. From the results, the weighted moving average forecasting method had the lowest MAD value of 1,987, making it the forecasting method with the highest accuracy for predicting the 50cl bottled water demand. While the exponential smoothing forecasting method had the highest MAD value of 2,483, making it the forecasting method with the least accuracy for predicting the 50cl bottled water demand. This research provides a procedure for aiding supply chain analysts in implementing demand forecasting using classical time series forecasting models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用经典时间序列预测模型预测瓶装水供应链的需求
本文通过对各种经典时间序列预测方法的比较,确定预测某瓶装水供应链中50cl产品需求的预测精度最高的预测方法。比较经典的时间序列预测方法有移动平均、加权移动平均、指数平滑、调整指数平滑、线性趋势线、Holt模型和Winter模型。对这些方法进行评估,以确定平均绝对偏差(MAD)值最小的方法,从而确定预测精度最高的方法。从结果来看,加权移动平均预测方法的MAD值最低,为1987,是预测50cl瓶装水需求量精度最高的预测方法。而指数平滑预测法的MAD值最高,为2483,是预测50cl瓶装水需求量精度最低的预测方法。本研究提供了一个程序,以协助供应链分析师实施需求预测使用经典的时间序列预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A survey on the effect of plastic pollution in the Great Lakes The bullwhip effect in supply chains: Review of recent development The effect of digital communication technologies in retail supply chain management: Evidence from Indian small retailers Resilience in waste management: A socioeconomic context for managing spent lithium batteries in Southeastern Nigeria A survey on the effect of global warming in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1