Model Agnostic Explainability Techniques in Ultrasound Image Analysis

Nicoletta Prentzas, Marios Pitsiali, E. Kyriacou, Andrew N. Nicolaides, A. Kakas, C. Pattichis
{"title":"Model Agnostic Explainability Techniques in Ultrasound Image Analysis","authors":"Nicoletta Prentzas, Marios Pitsiali, E. Kyriacou, Andrew N. Nicolaides, A. Kakas, C. Pattichis","doi":"10.1109/BIBE52308.2021.9635199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current adoption of Medical Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions in clinical practice suggest that despite its undeniable potential AI is not achieving this potential. A major barrier to its adoption is the lack of transparency and interpretability, and the inability of the system to explain its results. Explainable AI (XAI) is an emerging field in AI that aims to address these barriers, with the development of new or modified algorithms to enable transparency, provide explanations in a way that humans can understand and foster trust. Numerous XAI techniques have been proposed in the literature, commonly classified as model-agnostic or model-specific. In this study, we examine the application of four model-agnostic XAI techniques (LIME, SHAP, ANCHORS, inTrees) to an XGBoost classifier trained on real-life medical data for the prediction of high-risk asymptomatic carotid plaques based on ultrasound image analysis. We present and compare local explanations for selected observations in the test set. We also present global explanations generated from these techniques that explain the behavior of the entire model. Additionally, we assess the quality of the explanations, using suggested properties in the literature. Finally, we discuss the results of this comparative study and suggest directions for future work.","PeriodicalId":343724,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE52308.2021.9635199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The current adoption of Medical Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions in clinical practice suggest that despite its undeniable potential AI is not achieving this potential. A major barrier to its adoption is the lack of transparency and interpretability, and the inability of the system to explain its results. Explainable AI (XAI) is an emerging field in AI that aims to address these barriers, with the development of new or modified algorithms to enable transparency, provide explanations in a way that humans can understand and foster trust. Numerous XAI techniques have been proposed in the literature, commonly classified as model-agnostic or model-specific. In this study, we examine the application of four model-agnostic XAI techniques (LIME, SHAP, ANCHORS, inTrees) to an XGBoost classifier trained on real-life medical data for the prediction of high-risk asymptomatic carotid plaques based on ultrasound image analysis. We present and compare local explanations for selected observations in the test set. We also present global explanations generated from these techniques that explain the behavior of the entire model. Additionally, we assess the quality of the explanations, using suggested properties in the literature. Finally, we discuss the results of this comparative study and suggest directions for future work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声图像分析中的模型不可知性解释技术
目前在临床实践中采用医疗人工智能(AI)解决方案表明,尽管人工智能具有不可否认的潜力,但它并没有实现这一潜力。采用该系统的一个主要障碍是缺乏透明度和可解释性,以及该系统无法解释其结果。可解释人工智能(XAI)是人工智能的一个新兴领域,旨在通过开发新的或修改的算法来解决这些障碍,以实现透明度,以人类可以理解和培养信任的方式提供解释。文献中提出了许多XAI技术,通常被归类为模型不可知或模型特定。在这项研究中,我们研究了四种模型不可知的XAI技术(LIME, SHAP, ANCHORS, inTrees)在XGBoost分类器上的应用,该分类器基于真实医疗数据进行训练,用于基于超声图像分析预测高风险无症状颈动脉斑块。我们提出并比较了测试集中选定观测值的局部解释。我们还提出了由这些技术产生的解释整个模型行为的全局解释。此外,我们使用文献中建议的属性来评估解释的质量。最后,我们讨论了本比较研究的结果,并提出了未来工作的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structural, antimicrobial, and molecular docking study of 3-(1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)amino) ethylidene)chroman-2,4-dione and its corresponding Pd complex Multiple-Activation Parallel Convolution Network in Combination with t-SNE for the Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment Analyzing the Impact of Resampling Approaches on Chest X-Ray Images for COVID-19 Identification in a Local Hierarchical Classification Scenario Analysis of knee joint forces in different types of jumps of top futsal players at the beginning and at the end of the preparation period Design and evaluation of a noninvasive tongue-computer interface for individuals with severe disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1