Personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: the moderating role of demographic characteristics

D. Szostek, A. Balcerzak, E. Rogalska, Radka MacGregor Pelikánová
{"title":"Personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: the moderating role of demographic characteristics","authors":"D. Szostek, A. Balcerzak, E. Rogalska, Radka MacGregor Pelikánová","doi":"10.14254/2071-789x.2022/15-4/12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the current contribution is to determine how the personality traits (Extraversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness and Openness to experience) influence counterproductive work behaviors (CWB), and whether/to what extent this potential impact is moderated by employees’ main demographic characteristics. To reach the pointed aim a survey among 1,380 professionally active people in Poland was conducted. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) methodology was applied to analyze the obtained empirical data. The proposed theoretical models were intended to determine how particular types of personality affect organizational and interpersonal CWB and how those types of personality affect CWB (Production deviance, Abuse against others, Theft, Sabotage, Withdrawal) with potential moderating effects of demographic features. We confirmed that personality traits have an inverse relationship with counterproductive behavior. The strongest predicators of interpersonal and organizational CWB were: Conscientiousness (the correlation in both cases is negative), Agreeableness (only in the case of CWB-I – negative correlation), Neuroticism (CWB-O – negative correlation) and Extraversion (CWB-I – positive influence; CWB-O - negative influence). With regard to the subjective CWB categories, Agreeableness reduced Abuse against others the most, Openness to experience increased Withdrawal, and Extraversion – Abuse against others, while Neuroticism and Conscientiousness reduced Withdrawal the most. The pointed relationships were significantly moderated by the analyzed demographic variables, with most significant moderating effects recorded in the case of women, the elderly and people with longer work experience, as well as in office / clerical positions (compared to those holding managerial positions).","PeriodicalId":409504,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Sociology","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2022/15-4/12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The main objective of the current contribution is to determine how the personality traits (Extraversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness and Openness to experience) influence counterproductive work behaviors (CWB), and whether/to what extent this potential impact is moderated by employees’ main demographic characteristics. To reach the pointed aim a survey among 1,380 professionally active people in Poland was conducted. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) methodology was applied to analyze the obtained empirical data. The proposed theoretical models were intended to determine how particular types of personality affect organizational and interpersonal CWB and how those types of personality affect CWB (Production deviance, Abuse against others, Theft, Sabotage, Withdrawal) with potential moderating effects of demographic features. We confirmed that personality traits have an inverse relationship with counterproductive behavior. The strongest predicators of interpersonal and organizational CWB were: Conscientiousness (the correlation in both cases is negative), Agreeableness (only in the case of CWB-I – negative correlation), Neuroticism (CWB-O – negative correlation) and Extraversion (CWB-I – positive influence; CWB-O - negative influence). With regard to the subjective CWB categories, Agreeableness reduced Abuse against others the most, Openness to experience increased Withdrawal, and Extraversion – Abuse against others, while Neuroticism and Conscientiousness reduced Withdrawal the most. The pointed relationships were significantly moderated by the analyzed demographic variables, with most significant moderating effects recorded in the case of women, the elderly and people with longer work experience, as well as in office / clerical positions (compared to those holding managerial positions).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格特质与反生产行为:人口统计学特征的调节作用
本研究的主要目的是确定人格特质(外向性、神经质性、尽责性、亲和性和经验开放性)如何影响反生产行为(CWB),以及这种潜在影响是否/在多大程度上受到员工主要人口统计学特征的调节。为了达到这一明确的目标,在波兰对1380名职业活跃人士进行了调查。采用结构方程建模(SEM)方法对得到的经验数据进行分析。所提出的理论模型旨在确定特定类型的人格如何影响组织和人际间的反反行为,以及这些类型的人格如何影响反反行为(生产偏差、虐待他人、盗窃、破坏、退缩)以及人口统计学特征的潜在调节作用。我们证实了人格特质与反生产行为成反比关系。人际关系和组织性CWB的最强预测因子是:责任心(两者均为负相关)、宜人性(仅在CWB- 1负相关的情况下)、神经质(CWB- 0负相关)和外向性(CWB- 1正相关);CWB-O -负面影响)。在主观的CWB类别中,亲和性最大程度地减少了对他人的虐待,开放性增加了退缩,外向性-对他人的虐待,而神经质和尽责性最大程度地减少了退缩。所分析的人口变量显著地调节了这种尖锐的关系,在女性、老年人和工作经验较长的人以及办公室/文书职位(与那些担任管理职位的人相比)的情况下,记录了最显著的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenomena of precarity among young graduates – Hungarian case study Expectations of fulfilling the grandparent role in the context of maintaining professional activity. Analysis of an international survey Socio-economic profiles of countries - cybercrime victims Viruses don't need a passport to affect labor markets – findings from a Polish-German study on combating unemployment during the COVID-19 pandemic Cross-border mergers and acquisitions in the context of economic-behavioral phenomena
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1